We
in the media have been misleading in referring to Toll Bros.’ Sansom Street
skyscraper project as the “Jewelers Row” tower.
Although its lobby faces the Row, the 29-story monolith will also be
visible behind a group of historic Walnut Street townhouses and will directly
overlook Washington Square, one of Philadelphia’s most gracious parks.
Too
bad Toll’s architects forgot to design that side of the tower.
The
lapse barely received any comment last week when Toll presented its plans for
the 354-foot tower to the Washington Square West Civic Association, and I can
understand why. Until Toll unveiled the renderings at the meeting,
the debate revolved around the project’s impact on Jewelers Row, America’s
oldest and most intact diamond district. The loss of character will
be substantial. Not only will the project gouge out five 19th-century
structures, it will disrupt the street’s ecosystem, with
its distinctive mix of artisan workshops, wholesalers, and jewelry stores.
Although those structures have no historic
protection, Toll still needs to clear several hurdles before
demolition can begin, including a Feb. 7 hearing at the Design Review
board focusing on the look of the new tower. The Preservation
Alliance is hoping to use those hearings to mitigate the worst aspects of the
design. It is trying to shrink the tower back to the 16 stories in Toll’s
original proposal.
The
alliance is also waging a vigorous campaign to get Toll to
save the facades of the five targeted buildings, which it believes
would help the Jewelers Row ensemble retain its integrity.
But
let’s be honest. Even if those facades remain standing, it will be just a token
victory. It won’t stop the upscaling of Sansom Street or keep the Row
affordable for the artisans who populate the upper floors. And the fight to
save the facades distracts from something just as important as Jewelers Row:
the tower’s impact on Washington Square.
Toll’s
design record in Philadelphia has been, at best, underwhelming. With projects
like 2400 South Street and
the Naval Home, it assumes
slapping on some red brick is all it needs to create a contextual Philadelphia
design. We know Toll can do better, as evidenced by its latest New York
project, a flashy, faceted tower called 121 E22nd, by global
superstar Rem Koolhaas and his firm, OMA.
Toll’s
Sansom Street tower is its most strained attempt yet at contextualism. Designed
by New York’s SLCE Architects, the two-faced tower offers
redbrick traditionalism on the Jewelers Row side and glassy contemporary on
Walnut Street. The awkward vertical sandwich will stand as the physical
embodiment of indecision.
You
can just imagine the conversations that led to this split-personality
architecture: Give the jewelers something familiar, but cook up something sexy
on Washington Square that will appeal to well-heeled condo buyers.
“We
wanted to make sure the project weaved into the fabric of the neighborhood
[and] didn’t detract from it,” Toll vice president Brian Emmons told Washington
Square neighbors. But it appears SLCE ran out of steam after designing the
Jewelers Row side.
The
facade overlooking the square -- one of William Penn’s originals --
is a blank glass wall that will boomerang the strong southern light back onto
the park. With its immense trees, elegant paths, and Revolutionary War
memorial, the square is one of Philadelphia's most gracious public spaces, and
deserves to be cherished. In case anyone forgets, the square is only a block
from Independence Hall. Yet Toll's generic architecture is a pitiful
companion to the fine high-rises surrounding the park, including Oscar Stonorov’s modernist Hopkinson
House and Ralph Bencker’s art deco Ayer. On Walnut
Street, a row of early 19th-century townhouses designed by Benjamin Latrobe, America’s first trained
architect, will be reduced to four-story door-stoppers for Toll’s giant
mirror.
By
comparison, the Jewelers Row facade is a competent first try, especially at the
base.
It’s
easy to understand why SLCE chose a faux-factory look for Sansom Street. The
four-story base was clearly inspired by the building next door, and it evokes
other small manufacturing lofts nearby. Its redbrick facade features
casement-style windows divided into three bays by flat columns, topped with
limestone-colored caps. As an option, Toll also plans to show the Design Review
board a second design for the base with bigger windows. By itself, the base is
a handsome design.
There's
much more to it, of course. After a 15-foot setback, 25 more floors of casement
and brick rise straight up from the base. Although the slab tower has the
benefit of being relatively slim, it is weakly detailed, with no additional
setbacks and no balconies to relieve the regimentation.
Other
projects have also taken their inspiration from Philadelphia’s industrial past.
Have a look at 108 Arch, a 160-foot tower designed a decade
ago by New York’s SHoP Architects. Its facade features brick and factory-style
windows, but they are used in a less literal manner and are broken up with
concrete and zinc trim. Two strips of glass frame the composition in a way that
emphasizes its verticality.
Toll
deserves credit for its willingness to use a textured material like brick,
especially at a time when so many high-rise designs look like
oversize metal gas cans. But choosing brick shouldn’t be the end of the
design process.
As
for the mirrored monolith facing Washington Square? The architects need to
think about the tower design in a more holistic way. It’s one building, and all
of us are going to have to live with both sides of it.
Source: Philly.com
No comments:
Post a Comment