Marketplace premiums under the Affordable Care Act (ACA),
already a subject of perennial interest, have gained even more attention amid
unfavorable financial results from some insurers, as well as initial reports of
steep premium increases requested for 2017. Several factors will influence how
premiums will change in 2017, and there is reason to believe that increases will be higher
than in recent years.
Many of the initial reports of premium increases for 2017
have been based on anecdotal examples or averages across insurers. This brief
takes a different approach, presenting an early analysis of changes in insurer
participation and premiums for the lowest-cost and second-lowest silver
marketplace plans in major cities in 16 states plus the District of Columbia
where complete data on rates is publicly available for all insurers. Using this
information, we are able to calculate the premium a specific person might pay
without a premium tax credit, and take into account new plans entering the
market. It follows a similar approach to our analyses of 2014, 2015, and 2016 marketplace premiums. The two lowest-cost
silver plans are significant because they are the most common plan choices in the marketplaces, and
the second lowest-cost plan is the benchmark used to calculate government
premium subsidies.
While we cannot generalize to all states until more data
become available later this year, in most of these population centers, the
costs for the lowest and second-lowest silver plans are, in fact, increasing
faster in 2017 than they have in previous years. Based on insurer rate
requests, the cost of the second-lowest silver plan in these cities will
increase by a weighted average of 9% in 2017. Last year, premiums for the
second-lowest silver plans in these areas increased 2% following review by
state insurance departments. There is substantial variation across
markets, with premium changes for second-lowest silver plans ranging from a
drop of 13% to an increase of 25%. Premiums for 2017 are still preliminary and
could be raised or lowered through these states’ rate review processes.
We also find that some states will have fewer insurers
participating in 2017 than participated in 2016. On average across these
17 marketplaces, participation is down from 2016 but similar to that of 2014.
In the 17 marketplaces included in this analysis, 7 states will see insurer
participation remain steady or increase, while the other 10 states will see a
drop in the number of issuers, in many cases due to the withdrawal of
UnitedHealth.
Read the rest of this comprehensive report by going here….
No comments:
Post a Comment