Dive Brief:
Gilbane
Building Co. is catching heat from New York City trade unions for increasingly
using more nonunion subcontractors on city projects, The Wall Street Journal
reported.
Officials
at Gilbane said it currently has approximately $1.1 billion of work underway in
the city, but onlookers said that criticism has escalated since the company has
started to use nonunion labor on high-profile projects, such as a
1-million-square-foot office building renovation on Wall Street.
Some
critics blame Gilbane for setting an example for other large city construction
companies, some of which are rethinking their
collective bargaining agreements with local trade unions.
Dive Insight:
As
a way of voicing their opposition to Gilbane's hiring practices, unions have
turned out at the contractor's construction sites and New York city office to
hold protest rallies, complete with giant, inflatable rats — a nod to
the supposed character of companies that hire nonunion workers.
William
Gilbane III, who runs the company's New York office, said required union work
rules, like "expensive laborers to push buttons on automatic
elevators," drive up costs — which is one of the factors the
company uses when deciding which subcontractors to hire. On the other
hand, unions justify their higher wages by saying their workers
provide a higher quality and safer product than their nonunion
counterparts.
This
backlash against Gilbane is another consequence of what seems to be a chipping
away at the unions' grip on New York City's private construction industry.
Nationwide, unions are dealing with lower membership, which is
at an estimated half of what it was in 1983. Combine that with New York City
fixtures like Tishman Construction opting not to renew union contracts,
and it's no wonder that union members and their leadership are pushing back.
However, union presence, along with prevailing wage pay scales, is still strong
on public or publicly funded jobs.
Even
a traditionally union city like Boston has made it easier for nonunion
workers to provide labor to residential projects in order to meet housing
goals, and Boston trade unions have also reduced their pay scales on
certain housing projects, with various trades joining forces to provide a
"discount package" if a developer promises to use only union labor.
Nevertheless,
Gilbane denied the company is "union busting" in New York City and
stressed that it wants the most qualified workers on the job, union or
nonunion. The contractor also touted its emphasis on safety, as no worker has
ever died on any of its New York projects. Earlier this year, Gilbane said it wants
OSHA to mandate the use of safety harnesses for any construction worker
operating above 6 feet. The contractor said the policy, which the company
instituted on its own and is stricter than OSHA's requirements, has prevented
at least 20 potentially fatal falls on Gilbane jobs.
Recommended Reading
The
Wall Street Journal: Builder Riles Up Unions Amid Push Into
NYC Market
Source: Construction
Dive
No comments:
Post a Comment