A directive
to establish nationwide policies and procedures aimed at speeding up the
resolution of “whistleblower” complaints handled by the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA) was issued on August 19, 2015.
The directive outlines an “early resolution” process, to
be used as part of its Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) program. OSHA
piloted the process in two of its regional offices, and concluded that it
assisted parties in reaching mutual and voluntary resolutions in many cases.
That success prompted OSHA to expand the process to all regions.
The process is an alternative to the statutorily required
investigation of each complaint, and is intended to provide parties with the
opportunity to explore settlement with the assistance of a neutral,
confidential OSHA representative having subject-matter expertise in
whistleblower investigations. Although OSHA encourages use of the entirely
voluntary process before it commences an investigation, parties may choose ADR
at any time.
The process is entirely separate from the investigative
procedure, and information disclosed during ADR will not be shared with the
OSHA investigator if the matter is not resolved and returns to the
investigative stage. The ADR coordinator will not offer judgment on the merits,
but may give the parties an “objective perspective” on the strengths and
weaknesses of their respective positions. OSHA may terminate the process under
certain circumstances (for example, in the event it believes a party is not acting
in good faith), and is required to terminate the process upon the request of
either party.
ADR case files are generally confidential and exempt from
disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Approved settlement
agreements, however, are placed in the investigative case file, and, as a
result, may be subject to disclosure in response to an FOIA request. Therefore,
while the early resolution process may prove useful in resolving whistleblower
complaints quickly and efficiently, employers should exercise caution and
consult with counsel before participating in this process.
Source: Ballard Spahr, LLP
No comments:
Post a Comment