NORRISTOWN >> Montgomery County commissioners’
Chairman Josh Shapiro, along with other officials across the state, urged
Pennsylvania legislators Tuesday to consider the local ramifications of
allowing the General Assembly to set the parameters on what is and isn’t a
tax-exempt charity – an act that would amend the Pennsylvania Constitution.
The proposed amendment, known as Senate Bill 4, would
allow the legislature to determine what constitutes a purely public charity. If
a charity meets what the General Assembly’s qualifications, it would be deemed
tax-exempt and taken off of the property tax rolls in its county and
municipality.
“This is a concerning issue to us in Montgomery County and
I think in counties all across Pennsylvania,” Shapiro said in a conference call
with other officials and members of the press. “I can tell you with certainty
that if they move forward in the manner, budgets at the local level of
government will be significantly impacted by these decisions.”
During the conference call, Shapiro urged state lawmakers
to work with their local municipalities and counties to develop a “sensible
solution” to determining what qualifies as a tax-exempt organization “and who
should qualify for such status.”
“It is my opinion, that before they hastily push forward
a constitutional amendment, they should hold hearings and responsibly consider
the impact of such a decision before taking such a serious step like amending
the constitution of Pennsylvania,” Shapiro said.
Shapiro said if the Legislature moves forward, budgets at
the county and local levels will suffer during a time when many local and
county budgets are struggling.
“That means less money for education, less money for child
care, less money for human services, less money for local economic
development,” he said. “I would hope that they would slow down and carefully
consider the significant and potentially negative impacts on cities, counties
and municipalities all across Pennsylvania.”
Elam Herr, the assistant executive director of the
Pennsylvania State Association of Township Supervisors, said the constitutional
amendment would allow for charities that are not “purely public” to be taken
off of the tax rolls.
“Realize that not every tax-exempt institution or entity
out there is a purely public charity,” he said. “Everybody ought to realize
that any time an institution, an individual, an entity is taken off the
property tax rolls, somebody else—meaning the rest of the tax payers—is picking
up that loss. From our prospective it is beholden to the legislature to slow up
a little bit. They have two years that they can consider this legislation to
look at the ramifications that this has and come up with a truly reasonable and
fair standards for all that are involved.”
Because it is a proposed amendment to Pennsylvania’s
constitution it has to pass two consecutive legislative sessions before going
to a public vote in a referendum. The amendment passed for the first time during
the 2013-14 session.
State Sen. Ryan Aument, (R- 36th Dist.) re-introduced the bill on
Jan. 21, according to a press release on his website. The bill is
co-sponsored by Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati (R-25th Dist.).
The bill stems from a ruling from the Pennsylvania
Supreme Court, which, according to a press release on Aument’s website,
“returned to a vague standard, previously used from 1985-1997, that charitable
organizations must meet in order to qualify as a purely public charity.”
Charities have to meet five different criteria as set-up
by the court. In the 2012 case, the court ruled against the charity and for Pike
County.
“The court’s ruling will inevitably lead to protracted
and expensive legal battles that not only drain local tax dollars, but also
take money away from the core mission of some of our state’s most widely
respected charities,” Aument said in the press release. “The purely public
charity law was enacted in 1997 specifically to prevent this kind of situation,
and I am hopeful this legislation will help rectify a difficult situation that
resulted from the court’s poor judgment.”
A previous report from the Associated Press says if bill passes a second time, it could be seen by the public
in the form of a referendum vote as early as the May general election.
Source: The Times Herald
No comments:
Post a Comment