Credit Kirsten Luce for The
New York Times
|
City and state officials are negotiating with JPMorgan Chase over a potential deal
in which the nation’s largest bank would build a vast $6.5 billion corporate
campus with two high-rise towers in the new commercial district on the Far West
Side of Manhattan.
The talks, which involve one of the largest real estate
complexes for a single company in New York City history and a large package of
incentives for Chase, have reached a feverish state after nearly falling apart
this week.
The negotiations are so delicate that few people are
willing to discuss them publicly for fear of alienating one side or another.
But a deal with the bank poses political risks for both
the state and the city. Chase had initially sought, by one account, more than
$1 billion in concessions from the city and the state while it continues to
pare its payroll in the city. According to executives and officials, Chase
wants to build the two towers — whose total space would be the equivalent of
about two Empire State Buildings — at Hudson Yards on the north side of 33rd
Street, between 10th and 11th Avenues. They would become home to 16,000
employees.
The bank’s move to the West Side would accelerate the
transformation of a neighborhood once dominated by warehouses, factories and
tenements into a gleaming forest of glass towers.
For Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, offering
generous subsidies and special incentives would provide more fodder to critics
who say he has been too eager to please corporate and real estate interests
that represent important sources of financial support for his re-election
campaign.
And for Mayor Bill de Blasio, a fellow
Democrat, who has railed against corporate subsidies, supporting the project
would represent a significant departure that could be difficult to justify to
his supporters on the left. At the same time, if the mayor opposes the project,
it could leave him open to criticism that he is indifferent to the needs of the
city’s largest employers.
The bank, however, has insisted that the benefits from
the proposed deal would outweigh the value of any concessions or subsidies,
especially since Chase would have to buy development rights from the city and
make certain annual payments in order to erect the towers.
The bank’s “wish list” of concessions, however, has
shrunk significantly in recent days. And the talks have picked up momentum,
although a deal is far from assured. State officials are creating a
counteroffer.
“There’s no way that the city would entertain a demand
for a billion dollars in additional incentives at Hudson Yards,” said Alicia
Glen, the deputy mayor for economic development. “We have always been willing
to engage with them in a dialogue about how we could be helpful in making a
move more feasible.”
Related Companies,
one of the city’s most prolific developers, is building two office towers on
the adjoining railyards that will be home to Time Warner and Coach, as well as
several residential towers. The buildings are part of Related’s $15 billion
development at the yards, which has picked up steam in the last two years.
But Chase must also come to terms with Related, which
owns the two sites where the bank hopes to build. The bank wants to buy the
property but it does not necessarily want Related to build its new
headquarters. Related recently suggested that Chase build one of the towers and
occupy half of the Time Warner building, a plan that the bank is likely to
reject.
Chase first approached city and state officials in June
with the idea of building on the West Side property. Under the proposal, Chase
would build a 62-story tower and a 40-story tower, for a total of nearly four
million square feet.
“We don’t have a
deal yet,” Related’s chairman, Stephen M. Ross, said on Thursday. “I don’t know
if we can make one. A lot depends upon the city and the state.”
As is often the case in these kinds of deals, the bank
drew up a lengthy list of possible concessions. Chase wanted to cut the
mortgage recording tax, the transfer tax and sales taxes on construction
materials. It also sought job-training grants, low-cost power from the state,
an underground passageway between the two buildings that would require
alterations to the newly built No. 7 subway station and financial help with
reinforcing the foundation.
The neighborhood, formerly part of Hell’s Kitchen, was
rezoned eight years ago for high-rise development by then-Mayor Michael R.
Bloomberg. The rezoning included tax breaks and other incentives intended to
encourage new construction.
City officials, who estimated that there are already $600
million in tax breaks and other incentives associated with the two sites, have
been reluctant to sweeten the deal for Chase.
The Bloomberg administration issued $3 billion in bonds
to pay for parks, a new tree-lined boulevard and an extension of the No. 7
subway line from Times Square to the spot where Chase wants to build the new
towers.
Officials at the time had assured skeptics that
development fees and payments in lieu of taxes from new towers would cover the
debt payments. But development has been slower than anticipated, prompting the
city to take more than $130 million from the city budget to make the annual
debt payments.
Proponents of the Chase deal have argued that the city
would no longer have to make those debt payments if the bank were allowed to
build.
But there are many new residential towers in the
neighborhoods, and Related has lured companies to the new commercial district.
City and state officials also understand that Chase’s payroll is unlikely to
grow as it relocates lower-level employees to other states.
Chase’s current corporate home is spread primarily over
two buildings, at 270 Park Avenue and 383 Madison Avenue, which the bank could
sell for a premium in the current real estate market. The bank has about 20,000
corporate employees in the city, not including executives and clerks at its 758
branch offices. Another 10,000 employees work upstate in cities like Buffalo
and Syracuse.
A year ago, Chase
sold Chase Manhattan Plaza, a 60-story building, for $725 million. The
tower had been built in the early 1960s by David Rockefeller, then the bank’s
chairman, as an expression of its commitment to the financial district.
Chase has been eager to reduce its costs in New York and
move technical and operational employees to lower-cost locations in Delaware,
New Jersey and elsewhere. In May, the bank announced plans to expand its
technology and operations hub in Jersey City by 1,000 jobs after the bank was
granted significant tax breaks by New Jersey, which has offered subsidies to
companies willing to relocate from New York.
“For high-end jobs, New York City is the place to be,”
said Kathryn S. Wylde, president of the Partnership
for New York City, a business group. “But the midlevel jobs are at risk.”
Source: The
New York Times
No comments:
Post a Comment