When workers volunteer to attend work-related meetings
during their lunch break, are they dedicated employees eager to go the extra
mile, or do they signal a legal problem? That’s an issue recently put to a
group of attorneys who focus on employment law matters. Their advice: Be
careful.
The attorneys were asked what to do about a few exempt
and nonexempt
employees who want to volunteer to have a monthly meeting during their
lunch break on company premises. The employer asks if such a meeting would be
considered time worked that should be paid.
Reggie Gay, an attorney with the McNair
Law Firm in Greenville, South Carolina, points out that employees who are
not exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA) must be compensated for work-related voluntary meetings because FLSA
regulations state that “work not requested but suffered or permitted is work
time.”
Nonexempt employees are to be paid for rest breaks that
are shorter than 30 minutes. Longer breaks, including meal breaks, don’t have
to be paid as long as employees are completely relieved of duty, Gay says.
“To determine whether a break is compensable,
courts look at a number of factors, including the restrictions placed on
employees, the extent to which the restrictions benefit the employer,
employees’ duties during the break, and the frequency of interruption,” Gay
says. So employees not relieved of duty should be paid.
“Note that employers can require employees to stay on the
premises or use a designated lunch area as long as employees are completely
relieved of work,” Gay says. “Simply put, leave employees alone on their
breaks, and allow them to use the time for their purposes.
Some employees are exempt from FLSA requirements, but
“exemptions are narrowly construed,” Gay says, and employers need to make sure
employees are classified correctly. The most common exemptions are the
executive, administrative, professional, outside sales, and computer
professional exemptions. Employees qualifying for an exemption must meet both
the duties test and the salary test. Employees meeting those requirements may
be paid a fixed amount regardless of time worked and therefore would be able to
attend the voluntary meetings without being paid for the time.
Jerrald L. Shivers, an attorney
with The Kullman Firm in Jackson,
Mississippi, agrees that nonexempt employees spending time discussing
work-related issues or improving productivity or products must be paid, but
casual lunchroom conversations aren’t compensable.
Jonathan C. Sterling, an
attorney with Carlton Fields
Jorden Burt in Hartford, Connecticut, also says nonexempt employees would
need to be paid for the voluntary meetings. “To avoid an obligation to pay,
prohibit nonexempt employees from attending the meetings,” he says.
H. Mark Adams, an attorney with Jones Walker LLP in New Orleans,
says the voluntary lunch meetings constitute a scenario “fraught with potential
pitfalls.” Besides making sure nonexempt employees are treated correctly under
the FLSA, the employer needs to understand the purpose of the volunteer
meetings. “If the purpose is to discuss employee concerns, gripes, or
grievances, you may have an informal labor organization on your hands, which
opens a whole Pandora’s box of issues,” he says.
Mark Schorr, an attorney with Erickson &
Sederstrom, P.C. in Lincoln, Nebraska, says the question about the
voluntary lunch meetings is complicated by the fact that both exempt and
nonexempt employees want to participate. “Even when employees volunteer to work
‘off the clock,’ if you permit them to perform work that benefits your company,
the time spent doing so is compensable working time unless an individual
employee is truly exempt from overtime,” he says.
Nonexempt employees’ time would be compensable unless
they are not performing any duties that benefit the company. “In short, you may
not avoid your obligations under the (FLSA) simply because employees believe
they are ‘volunteering’ to attend a meeting that benefits their employer,” Schorr
says.
Source: HR
Hero Line
No comments:
Post a Comment