The picture was taken this morning and posted on Twitter by Kevin
McCorry of WHYY's Newsworks just before 9:30 a.m., at the
Philadelphia School District headquarters building at 440 North Broad Street.
In a matter of seconds -- in a meeting that would last
all of 17 minutes, and with one hasty comment from the public -- the
Philadelphia School Reform Commission, the state agency that has presided over
14 years of ruination of public education here, is about to explode a political
bombshell. The SRC is about to revoke its contract with the
Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, and cut the teachers' benefits -- and it's about to
do it before this nearly empty room.
This is no accident. The lack of a crowd, and the lack of
public debate, was an act of careful calculation. The calculation of cowards.
Forget the ABCs -- if you want to look at what's behind
this Day of Infamy for public education in Philadelphia, look no farther than
the 3 Ps: Policy, procedure, and, of course...politics.
1) Policy. Yes, yes, of course, it could have been
worse. Remember last year, when the SRC proposed massive pay cuts and even yanking
water fountains out of the classroom, as its opening gambit? Of
course, that was a ploy so they could instead come back this morning with their
"reasonable" package of no pay cuts (whoo-hooo...?) and requiring PFT
union members to pay a portion of their health insurance. (How much? Early
numbers suggest family coverage will cost from $71 to $200 a month out of the
teacher's pay.) SRC and district officials claim they'll pump the estimated $44
million in savings right back into the classroom...we'll see about that.
As a fellow union member who was just asked a few years
ago to pay toward my own health insurance, to help save a struggling operation,
part of me wants to look at the policy angle and shrug: Hey, it happens. Even
the leaders of the PFT have acknowledged that -- to help Philadelphia's school
kids survive this crisis that was NOT OF THE TEACHERS' MAKING -- some
concessions would be necessary. But the only outcome that would have made any real
sense was for this to happen cooperatively, at the bargaining table, and the
SRC has rarely displayed any enthusiasm for that.
Lost in the spin is the fact that health benefits for
retired teachers -- dental, vision, prescription drugs -- were also disappeared
by the SRC this morning. That's some lesson that American society teaches
today's schoolchildren: Work hard all your life and someday we'll break the
promises we made you, because we can. Yet the school district didn't break its
promises to Wall Street when it lost hundreds of millions of dollars in lousy
investments on "interest rate swaps," did it? What about
the "staggering" salaries that still go to
some of Superintendent Hite's top lieutenants? Why is it always the working men
and women who get screwed in these deals, and the retirees even more?
More to the point, if this is such a sound policy, why
not give it a full airing in public?....which brings us to:
2) The procedure! Although we all suspected and
feared that the SRC was capable of this, few thought they would actually try
this ploy. But they did. This morning's meeting was not listed yesterday on the
SRC website, and no notice was sent out to the media until early this morning,
about two hours before the vote was actually held. So how was it even legal?
The SRC quietly bought and buried this legal notice in the Classifieds section
of Sunday's Inquirer:
The notice -- which, in an understatement, was barely
seen by anyone -- doesn't state the reason for the meeting beyond "general
purposes." What's more, it says that, sure, members of the public
absolutely have a right to speak -- as long as they call the SRC and register
by 4:30 that afternoon. Was anyone even there to answer the phone on a Sunday?
We'll probably never know. The first notice of this in any media was posted
last night by the Philadelphia Public School Notebook at 10:43 p.m. last night,
or six hours and 13 minutes (about the length of a baseball playoff game*)
after the cutoff for speakers.
There's an old saying that if you want to do something
but you'd be embarrassed to tell your mom or dad about it, then...don't do it.
How bad are your actions when you're too embarrassed to tell 1.5 million
Philadelphians about it? I'd say, pretty bad -- and that makes one wonder, how
much of this is really about "the kids" and how much of this is
old-fashioned...
3) Politics. The contract stalemate between the
SRC and the PFT has been going on for 21 months, so why take this vote in such
a rash and arrogant fashion on this particular morning, October 6, 2014? Could
it be because it's exactly 29 days before Pennsylvania votes on whether to keep
Gov. Corbett -- who appointed the majority on the five-member SRC -- or ditch
him for Democrat Tom Wolf.
Do you remember that it was just last year that a Republican firm took a secret poll and used the report to
urge Gov. Corbett that there was only one way that the foundering, unpopular
governor could restore his image on education issues: To confront the
Philadelphia teachers union. Now, with Corbett in the political
fight of his life and losing badly, the school commission led by the governor's
appointees is starting a fight with the Philadelphia teachers' union.
What a remarkable coincidence!
Look, I know what you're thinking -- Corbett is getting
clobbered so badly in the polls that what does it matter at this point. I agree
-- but why do NFL teams keep lobbing Hail Mary passes when they're losing by
five touchdowns? Maybe Corbett figures a tough stance will appeal to suburban
voters (although most of them are too freaked out by their own sky-high
property taxes to notice). Maybe he's desperate for the chaos of a teacher's
strike, which would violate a 1992 state law. Here's a prominent Philadelphia Republican (yes,
that's a thing, apparently) who came out practically minutes after the SRC vote
saying that a) he hates (yes, hates) the union but b) pleads with them to
strike. Another coincidence? A strike (which I seriously doubt will happen --
look for this to be fought in court) would be devastating to tens of thousands
of schoolchildren. But, hey, politics ain't beanbag.
But even if you're a Corbett supporter, and even if you
think those "pampered" teachers need to be taken down a few notches,
you still should be outraged at the massive one-fingered salute that the SRC
just gave to the notion of democracy and public discourse, and to the people of
Philadelphia. In Hong Kong this month, tens of thousands of
people took to the streets because their dear leaders won't allow them to
nominate their own candidates to lead local government. But how is what the SRC
just did in the fog today any better? This almost-secret, barely legal meeting
was a heartbreaking act of staggering cowardice. Every one of them -- SRC
Chairman Bill Green (whose grandfather, a post-New Deal Democrat, surely would not have
been pleased by this), and members Feather Houstoun, Farah Jimenez, Marjorie
Neff, and Sylvia Simms -- is a gutless coward. They should be ashamed of what
they've done.
* Slight sarcasm on the baseball.
Source: Philly.com
No comments:
Post a Comment