A total of 423 employers—an
increase of 23 percent from a year ago—make up the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration’s (OSHA) really bad actors list, according to recently
updated data.
Eighty workplaces have been
added to OSHA’s Severe Violator Enforcement Program (SVEP) log since July 1,
2013. Five companies successfully contested violations and were removed from
the program in that time.
The SVEP is intended to focus
enforcement efforts on significant hazards and violations by concentrating
inspection resources on employers who have demonstrated recalcitrance or
indifference to their Occupational Safety and Health Act obligations, according
to OSHA.
The program subjects
employers to more-significant enforcement measures and penalties for willful,
repeat and failure-to-abate violations. To be declared a severe violator, an
employer must have been cited by OSHA as having committed willful, repeat or
failure-to-abate violations in any of the following circumstances:
- A fatality or catastrophe situation.
- In industry operations or processes that expose employees to the most severe occupational hazards and those identified as High-Emphasis Hazards, such as falls, amputations, combustible dust, crystalline silica, excavation/trenching, lead and shipbreaking.
- Exposing employees to the potential release of a highly hazardous chemical.
- Any egregious enforcement actions.
Once an establishment is
designated a severe violator, OSHA may inspect the employer’s other worksites.
The employer can also expect frequent follow-up visits by OSHA inspectors.
Construction companies make
up about 60 percent of the severe violators list, with manufacturers
representing another 28 percent. About 55 percent of violators are small
employers, with less than 10 employees. Only 14 percent are employers with more
than 100 workers. Nearly half of the employers on the list are contesting their
citations through the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.
Removal from SVEP
An employer may be considered
for removal from the program after:
- Three years have passed from the final disposition of the citation that produced the SVEP designation. Final disposition includes a final order from the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, a court of appeals decision, a settlement agreement with OSHA or a decision not to contest the citation.
- The employer has abated all affirmed violations, paid all final penalties, abided by and completed all settlement provisions, and not received any additional serious citations related to the hazards identified in the SVEP inspection at the initial establishment or at any related establishments.
If the employer fails to
adhere to these terms during the three-year probationary period, it will remain
in the program for an additional three years and will then be re-evaluated.
Thirty-nine companies on the
current list have completed the probationary period and have undergone their
initial follow-up inspections. None of them have been scheduled for removal.
Eric Conn, head of the OSHA
Practice Group at Epstein Becker Green, is one of the foremost critics of the
program. Among the various issues Conn has brought up since the
program’s inception in 2010, he says the most fundamental flaw of the SVEP
is branding employers as severe violators before proving the employers broke
the law.
“In a society that values due
process, OSHA should be required to first prove the underlying violations that
serve as the basis for qualifying an employer into the SVEP, before
broadcasting to the world that the employer belongs in a special category of
bad actors,” he said.
Although it takes willful or
repeat violations to get into the SVEP, one serious violation can have lasting
repercussions. Conn said few companies will ever make it off the list after
enduring three years of follow-up visits, given the fact that OSHA inspections
turn up at least one serious violation about 75 percent of the time.
You can view this webinar presented by Conn to learn more about how and
when employers are entered into the SVEP, the consequences involved, and tips
to help employers.
Source: SHRM.org
No comments:
Post a Comment