R Cases
Garda CL Atlantic, Inc. (29-RC-197242) Queens, NY, December 6, 2017. The Board denied the Intervenor’s Request for Review of the Acting Regional Director’s Decision and Direction of Election as it raised no substantial issues warranting review. The Board agreed that documents proffered by the Intervenor did not serve to bar an election. Petitioner – Special and Superior Officers Benevolent Association. Intervenor – United Federation of Special Police and Security Officers. Members Pearce, McFerran, and Emanuel participated.
C Cases
Emerald Correctional Management, L.L.C. (28-CA-188682 and 28-CA-192201) San Luis, AZ, December 4, 2017. No exceptions having been filed to the October 19, 2017 decision of Administrative Law Judge John T. Giannopoulos’ finding that the Respondent had engaged in certain unfair labor practices, the Board adopted the judge’s findings and conclusions, and ordered the Respondent to take the action set forth in the judge’s recommended Order. Charges filed by an individual and International Guards Union of America.
Good Shepherd Manor, Inc. (25-CA-191404, et al.) Bradley, IL, December 4, 2017. No exceptions having been filed to the October 23, 2017 decision of Administrative Law Judge Michael A. Rosas’ finding that the Respondent had engaged in certain unfair labor practices, the Board adopted the judge’s findings and conclusions, and ordered the Respondent to take the action set forth in the judge’s recommended Order. Charges filed by American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Council 31, AFL-CIO.
Lundeen Simonson, Inc. (19-CA-195000) Spokane, WA, December 4, 2017. No exceptions having been filed to the October 17, 2017 decision of Administrative Law Judge Jeffrey D. Wedekind’s finding that the Respondent had engaged in certain unfair labor practices, the Board adopted the judge’s findings and conclusions, and ordered the Respondent to take the action set forth in the judge’s recommended Order. Charge filed by Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons International Association, Local No. 72.
Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center (21-CA-190102) Pomona, CA, December 4, 2017. No exceptions having been filed to the October 23, 2017 decision of Administrative Law Judge Lisa D. Thompson’s finding that the Respondent had not engaged in certain unfair labor practices, the Board adopted the judge’s findings and conclusions, and dismissed the complaint. Charge filed by Service Employees International Union – United Healthcare Workers – West.
Heartland Coca-Cola Bottling Company, LLC (14-CA-195320) St. Charles, MO, December 4, 2017. No exceptions having been filed to the October 23, 2017 decision of Administrative Law Judge Andrew S. Gollin’s finding that the Respondent had engaged in certain unfair labor practices, the Board adopted the judge’s findings and conclusions, and ordered the Respondent to take the action set forth in the judge’s recommended Order. Charge filed by an individual.
Roy Spa, LLC (19-CA-083329) Great Falls, MT, December 5, 2017. The Board denied Respondent’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Board’s Decision and Order reported at 365 NLRB No. 114. The Board found that Respondent had failed to identify any material error or demonstrate extraordinary circumstances warranting reconsideration. In the underlying decision, the Board adopted the Administrative Law Judge’s finding that the General Counsel’s position on the merits was substantially justified and therefore adopted his order denying Respondent’s application for an award under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Chairman Miscimarra dissented from the underlying decision based on his view in the Board’s first consideration of this case (363 NLRB No. 183) that the judge abused his discretion by accepting the General Counsel’s untimely filed Motion to Dismiss. Nevertheless, Chairman Miscimarra agreed that Respondent had not demonstrated extraordinary circumstances warranting reconsideration. Charge filed by International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2. Administrative Law Judge Robert A. Giannasi issued his supplemental decision on July 12, 2016. Chairman Miscimarra and Members Pearce and McFerran participated.
Bethany College (14-CA-201546 and 14-CA-201584) Lindsborg, KS, December 6, 2017. The Board denied the Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Complaint or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment, finding that the Respondent failed to establish that there are no genuine issues of material fact warranting a hearing and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Members Kaplan and Emanuel joined in the denial of the motion but expressed no opinion on whether Pacific Lutheran University, 361 NLRB 1404 (2014), was correctly decided. Charges filed by an individual. Members McFerran, Kaplan, and Emanuel participated.
***
Masonic Temple Association of Detroit and 450 Temple, Inc., a Single Employer, Board Case 07-CA-144521 (reported at 364 NLRB No. 150) (6th Cir. decided December 4, 2017)
In an unpublished order, the Court enforced the Board’s bargaining order issued against these two entities, the Masonic Temple Association of Detroit, Michigan, and its for-profit business arm, 450 Temple, Inc., as a single employer, in their operation hosting events, such as weddings, parties, and concerts, at the complex’s 20-story tower that contains a 4,000-seat theater, a ballroom, and restaurants. For over 50 years, Local 324, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, and its predecessor, have represented the maintenance engineers, boiler operators, and operating engineers at the complex under a series of collective-bargaining agreements with various operators.
In January 2011, while negotiations for a successor contract were underway, the association’s general manager told a unit employee that the association president planned to refuse to recognize the Union. After learning of that statement, the Union filed an unfair-labor-practice charge, which the parties then settled and continued bargaining. In December 2012, the then-operator ended its relationship with the association and was replaced by 450 Temple, but the association president continued to oversee collective bargaining. After negotiations stalled, and over the course of the next two years, the Union made repeated demands for bargaining and attempted to reach the president to schedule further negotiations. Meanwhile, the Employers, despite not responding to the Union’s bargaining requests, continued to remit union dues and to pay medical and insurance payments to the Union. On January 13, 2015, when the Union finally spoke with the president on the phone, the president refused to bargain, stated that the companies would never again be a union employer, and hung up. On the basis of that refusal to bargain, and its rejection of a claim that the underlying charge was time-barred, the Board (then-Chairman Pearce, and Members Miscimarra and McFerran) found that the companies, as a single employer, violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1).
On review, the companies presented two arguments to the Court. First, they argued that the complaint was time-barred under Section 10(b) because the Union had notice of their refusal to bargain back in January 2011. Rejecting that contention, the Court adopted the Board’s explanation that although the companies had failed to respond to the Union’s repeated demands to negotiate, “they continued to remit dues and medical and insurance payments,” and that “it was not until January 13, 2015, that [they] clearly and unequivocally informed the Union that they would not recognize or bargain with it.” Second, the companies claimed that they were privileged to refuse to bargain because they had a good-faith doubt that the Union still enjoyed the support of a majority of unit employees. As evidence, the companies cited the association president’s testimony that none of the employees told him that “they were currently or wanted to be union members.” In response, the Court cited Board authority holding that the issue of majority support “turns on whether most unit employees wish to have union representation, not on whether most unit employees are [union] members.”
The Court’s judgment order may be found here.
***
Anderson Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Royal Motor Sales (20-CA-187567; JD(SF)-51-17) San Francisco, CA. Administrative Law Judge Jeffrey D. Wedekind issued his decision on December 4, 2017. Charge filed by an individual.
Bexar County Performing Arts Center Foundation d/b/a Tobin Center for the Performing Arts (16-CA-193636; JD-95-17) San Antonio, TX. Administrative Law Judge Arthur J. Amchan issued his decision on December 5, 2017. Charge filed by Local 23, American Federation of Musicians.
Brasfield & Gorrie, LLC (09-CA-199567; JD-96-17) Birmingham, AL. Administrative Law Judge Andrew S. Gollin issued his decision on December 8, 2017. Charge filed by United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America (UBC), Indiana/Kentucky/Ohio Regional Council of Carpenters.
***
Source: NLRB
No comments:
Post a Comment