The longest contract stalemate in Philadelphia School
District history appears to be over, with teachers overwhelmingly approving a
new contract worth $395 million Monday night after four bitter years.
The three-year deal will mean raises for the more than
11,000 members of the Philadelphia Federation of Teachers, the city’s largest
union, though it will not make educators whole for five years of frozen wages.
“We are really, really pleased about the agreement,”
Jerry Jordan, PFT president, said after a general membership meeting at the
Liacouras Center of Temple University.
But even as union leadership celebrated the vote — 95
percent of members who voted endorsed the contract — politicians made clear there
is no plan in place to pay for it.
And some officials in Harrisburg sounded ominous notes
about their willingness to help foot the bill, which is $245 million more than
the district has budgeted. A source close to the negotiations has said that the
deal could mean teacher layoffs down the road.
Republicans who control both legislative chambers in
Harrisburg threw cold water on any expectation that the state would send
Philadelphia more money to help it pay for the contract.
“It makes it very difficult to take any request from
Philadelphia seriously when they do nothing that appears to help themselves –
and then they negotiate a contract which they admit is based on fantasy,” said
Steve Miskin, spokesman for House Republicans.
Drew Crompton, the top lawyer for Senate Republicans,
said he was flabbergasted by the move to approve a contract for which the
district does not have the money.
“I can’t fathom the school board signing a deal that they
fundamentally know that they can’t pay for,” he said. “It’s perplexing.”
City Council President Darrell L. Clarke said that the
contract brings needed stability, and that Mayor Kenney and Council would
be looking at potential revenue in the
next several months. It was clear to all parties that any multiyear contract
would mean a gap in funding, Clarke said, as the district projects a deficit
beginning next year.
“We will be at the state’s door, knocking on the door,
asking them to meet us, help us meet this obligation,” Clarke said. “I don’t
know how that will play out, but we’re hoping.”
Kenney issued a statement thanking the union members for
their endorsement of the deal.
“I know full well that throughout this long and difficult
process, you have remained dedicated to the single most important matter: educating
our city’s children. While I know this
new contract does not make you entirely whole, I am confident that teachers,
administrators and families will make greater strides in improving how our
children learn and thrive in Philadelphia’s public schools,” he said.
Superintendent William R. Hite Jr. welcomed the vote.
“I am pleased the PFT has ratified our tentative
agreement and that this tentative agreement will now go before the School
Reform Commission for approval tomorrow,” he said in a statement. “This is a contract which benefits our
teachers, our students, and provides stability for the entire School District
of Philadelphia.”
The contract does not give straight across-the-board
raises, but does resume “steps,” or pay for years of experience, and
compensation based on advanced degrees. It gives teachers a combination of
one-time payments, percentage bumps in salary, and movement in the step system
to help recoup some of the years of pay raises they missed while the contract
was frozen.
Educators will also begin paying for their health
insurance: 1.25 percent of their base salary in September, 1.5 percent in 2019.
Under the current contract, brand-new teachers with no
advanced degrees are paid $45,360. By the end of the new contract, they would
make $46,267. Teachers at the top of the pay scale now max out at $90,051; that
would rise to $91,852.
There will also be some changes in work rules. In one
concession, the PFT accepted universal “site selection,” which allows
principals to hire the teachers they want without considering seniority.
Seniority will still guide layoffs and recalls.
Outside the Liacouras Center, many PFT members said that
they thought the contract was not perfect, but that it was the best they were
going to get.
“It’s a good compromise,” said Ninoska Wong Shing, a
counselor at Farrell Elementary in the Northeast.
“In an ideal world, I would get credit for all my years
of experience and I would be getting all my retroactive pay,” said Chrisostomos Argerakis, a music teacher at
South Philadelphia’s Andrew Jackson Elementary School. But, he said, this felt like a realistic
deal, though he will lose out on tens of thousands of dollars.
Argerakis has nine years of experience teaching, but has
been paid as a fifth-year teacher. He works a second job on top of dedicating
hundreds of unpaid hours to Home, a rock band made up of Jackson students.
The Caucus of Working Educators, a group that has
challenged Jordan’s leadership, did not take a yes or no position on the
contract, but said in fliers its members handed out as teachers walked into the
Liacouras Center, “We don’t believe the contract addresses most of the core
issues that educators care about, and won’t help create the schools that
students and educators deserve.”
The caucus said it wanted to see movement on smaller
classes, building issues, the arts, teacher-led training, and other issues.
George Bezanis, a caucus member who went so far as to
crowd-fund campaigns for a billboard on I-95 and a banner plane to call out
city and district leaders on the contract stalemate, said he voted yes,
although reluctantly.
“There are some things that gave me pause,” said Bezanis.
“In the end, because we’ve pushed so hard for this, I did vote yes, but I wish
there was a ‘yes, but I don’t like that, and I don’t like that.’”
Source: Philly.com
No comments:
Post a Comment