In his exit interview with the Philadelphia Business
Journal, Mayor Michael Nutter drew a distinction between how the business
community and organized labor each wield their considerable influence.
In the second part of our web exclusive, the outgoing
mayor clearly thinks business leaders could play a larger role in pushing
forward a broader agenda if they wanted to go that route.
We have a strong, active union presence. There’s nothing
wrong with that. But they’re not the only employer in the city. And the
business leaders — small, medium and large — provide jobs. And so at times as a
government, we need that sort of triangular partnership. Or if you want to make
it a square and include the philanthropic and foundation community. There’s
room enough in a city of 138 square miles literally and figuratively for
leadership from a variety of quarters.
The unions fight for union jobs and employee rights.
That’s they’re job and responsibility. At the same time, the business community
could have a stronger voice, a louder voice, if they decided that they want to
do that. When you are collectively responsible for 600,000 plus jobs, not just
in Center City but in neighborhoods all across the city, I think that’s a very
powerful force if it decides to engage.
Many of the business leaders are primarily focused on
their business and what affects them. I think at times, we’re missing the
broader view, the more collective view of what’s in the best interest of the
city of Philadelphia. I’m not just talking about the city government but the
entity that is the city and our citizens. I’ve been a strong advocate for the
business community to be louder, more aggressive and more active in voicing
their opinion to elected officials and others in a way that is productive.
Do you think unions, particularly the building and
trades, will have more or less influence over the city’s business climate in
the coming years?
People look for opportunities or circumstance to
influence and if they see an opportunity, they move forward. Again, there’s
nothing wrong with that. And there’s nothing stopping business people from
being as influential as they want to be. If they decide that’s they want to do
that. I mean, to be a leader, you have to decide you want to be a leader.
There’s no one’s standing in the way of the business
community being more active in politics, being more actively engaged on the
fundraising side, actively engaged in helping to develop public policy. John
Dougherty or Joe Jones, if they want to be influential, they take steps to be
influential. But the playing field is wide open.
Source: Philadelphia
Business Journal
No comments:
Post a Comment