A National Labor Relations Board ruling that modified the
definition of an employer could hurt small businesses including franchises and
subcontractors, according to industry groups that advocate for those companies.
The NLRB decision Thursday came in a case involving waste
management company Browning-Ferris Industries and a staffing company, Leadpoint
Business Services, which supplied workers to Browning-Ferris. The NLRB ruled
that Browning-Ferris is a joint employer with Leadpoint. The board said it will
consider factors such as whether a company exercised control over employees
"indirectly through an intermediary, or whether it has reserved the
authority to do so" in determining whether companies are joint employers.
Before the ruling, companies had to have exercised
"direct operational and supervisory control" over employees to be
considered joint employers.
The written decision did not mention franchises, but two
dissenting members of the five-member NLRB listed franchisors and franchisees
among the business relationships that would be affected by the ruling.
The franchise industry is concerned because
individually-owned franchises, which are often owned by small companies, could
now be drawn into national labor disputes, said the International Franchise
Association.
"The new standard would also increase the likelihood
of union 'campaigns' against national businesses, while forcing small
businesses to become engaged in protracted, unnecessary and costly legal
battles," the IFA said in a statement.
Franchises are also concerned because the NLRB's Office
of General Counsel contended earlier this year that McDonald's has enough
control over its franchisees' operations to be considered a joint employer with
the owners of individual restaurants. That opinion was issued prior to a series
of hearings on charges brought against McDonald's and some of its franchisees
by employees; the outcome of those hearings is still pending.
Franchise owners have also contended they could lose
their autonomy if franchisors become joint employers with them, and therefore
can have more say in their hiring and management practices.
Other small businesses can also be affected, according to
the National Federation of Independent Business. It contends a company that
hires a subcontractor to do work could be considered a joint employer with the
subcontractor.
"Subcontractors will come under pressure by their
clients to change their employment policies or they'll be cut out of the
picture altogether," said Beth Milito, an attorney for the NFIB.
The ruling was also criticized by the National Retail
Federation, which said it unnecessarily blurred the distinctions between
companies that are independent of one another. The National Restaurant
Association said the ruling would have a negative impact on franchisees'
decisions to expand and hire more workers.
Source: US
News and World Report
No comments:
Post a Comment