There are approximately 1,400 multiemployer pension plans
and nearly 10% are projected to become insolvent within the next 15 years. Plan
insolvency will trigger a termination and the assessment of withdrawal
liability.
Collectively, these plans have more than $30 billion in
unfunded liabilities. These plans are now being designated as "critical
and declining status" and have the authority to reduce benefits under the
changes to the law made in 2014. While those benefit cuts, which require regulatory
approval, may forestall insolvency for a while, they are not going to reduce
any withdrawal liability over the next 10 years.
As these plans become more desperate financially, some
are seeking to discourage additional withdrawals and to maximize the withdrawal
liability of the employers that do exit the plan. At least four plans, through
their actuaries, have dramatically reduced the interest rate assumption to
calculate withdrawal liability.
Rather than using the plan's assumed rate of return,
typically 7-8%, they have adopted the PBGC long term interest rate of slightly
more than 3% to calculate the unfunded vest benefit liabilities and, hence,
withdrawal liability. These interest rate changes are increasing the amount of
withdrawal liability by 200-400% depending on the methodology used to calculate
withdrawal liability.
One plan even made the change retroactive to an employer
that already had incurred a complete withdrawal which is unlawful.
Unfortunately, the plans are not required to give any advance notice of the
interest rate changes so it is important companies monitor their liability by
annually requesting an estimate of liability. Companies can and should consider
contesting rate changes if unreasonable based on past plan experience and
projected experience.
Government contractors are also experiencing a rise in
withdrawal liability when they are required under the contract and collective
bargaining agreement to participate in the SEIU National Pension Plan or the
IUE-CWA plan — both of which have been in critical status for many years.
Unfortunately, if the government does not renew the contract a withdrawal will
occur and liability will be assessed.
That liability can accumulate rapidly to $500,000 or more
with only 20 workers — wiping out any expected profits from the contract and
placing the company in financial jeopardy. Contractors are advised, therefore,
to assess their potential liability before bidding on these contracts and
joining these plans.
Alternatives should be explored. Some multiemployer plans
also offer 401(k) plans or hybrid direct attribution plans than can avoid or
limit this risk.
Employers in critical plans need to understand and manage
this mounting withdrawal liability before it becomes so great that it exceeds
the net worth of a company. There are methods under the law to reduce the
liability and to avoid controlled group liability.
If your company is in such a plan, it is always better to
assess the situation before a withdrawal occurs. For those companies
considering joining such plans to obtain government work or new business, you
need to know the true cost of doing business that is associated with this
pension liability and consider other options as well.
Pension liability risk management is now more critical
than ever. If your company triggers a withdrawal, you need to act within 90
days to preserve your legal rights.
Williams, a partner at FordHarrison, focuses his practice
on pension and transportation law. The information in this legal alert is for
educational purposes only and should not be taken as specific legal advice.
Source: Employee
Benefit News
No comments:
Post a Comment