Wednesday, March 25, 2015

Pa. Towns Fear Ripple Effect of State Labor Ruling



March 24--The prospect of Emmaus firefighters becoming paid, unionized employees of the borough after a state Labor Relations Board ruling has other Pennsylvania municipalities bracing for a potentially precedent-setting, costly change in the traditionally volunteer firefighting field.


Attorneys for statewide associations of boroughs and townships, fearing a ripple effect of the PLRB order that effectively declared about three dozen firefighters union employees of Emmaus, have chimed in on the ongoing legal battle, calling the ruling a "dangerous" development.

Lawyers representing both the Pennsylvania State Association of Township Supervisors and Pennsylvania State Association of Boroughs have filed papers in Commonwealth Court backing the borough's appeal of the PLRB order that became final in September.

"Other municipal governments similarly situated to the borough, and, by extension, taxpayers, may ultimately face significant financial impacts in the form of higher taxes and reduced services," attorney Scott E. Coburn, who represents the supervisors organization, wrote in a court filing in support of the borough's appeal.

"The PLRB's ruling ... could have negative financial ramifications not only for the borough, which would be faced with dozens of new employees and all of the costs associated therewith, but also potentially many other municipalities that, like the borough, provide financial and administrative assistance and equipment to volunteer fire departments."

The case already has had significant financial implications for Emmaus, which has about 12,000 residents and an annual general operating budget of about $8 million. The borough has spent $132,635 for legal fees and other costs associated with the case, according to figures provided by the borough. That includes a $30,000 study commissioned to examine the management and staffing needs of the department.

Council last year raised property taxes by an average of about $8, in part in anticipation of legal fees associated with the firefighter dispute.

Just last week, Borough Council hired a $50-per-hour consultant to help set up a paid professional fire department in the event it loses its appeal challenging the firefighters' union status. A paid fire department could eventually cost about the same as the police force. Council earmarks about $2.2 million for its police force, which has 18 officers and a chief.

A PLRB hearing officer last year ruled that three dozen firefighters were government workers and could form a union. The board subsequently dismissed Emmaus' objection to that ruling, prompting the borough to make plans to appeal its case to Commonwealth Court.

The original ruling was based largely on measures the borough and its council have taken in recent years with regard to the operation and oversight of and compensation for firefighters. A PLRB hearing officer wrote in his decision that the borough made firefighters borough employees by paying them hourly wages and "exercising significant control over their terms and conditions of employment."

The firefighters have since voted to support representation by the Pennsylvania Professional Firefighters Association.

The borough says in its appeal there has been no evidence presented showing that the borough hires or disciplines or has the authority to hire and discipline firefighters. It argues members of the fire department are selected by the department and approved by council.

Emmaus' attorneys also argue the firefighters can't claim an employment relationship because their volunteer relief association receives money from the state from a fund paid into by insurance companies. The Emmaus association has received $675,000 over the past eight years, according to court records.

The borough also argues it did not apply civil service and Veterans Preference Act requirements to fire department members, which means they could face criminal and civil liabilities for violating state law.

Attorney Stanley Laskowski, representing the Pennsylvania State Association of Boroughs, says in an 18-page legal brief that the PLRB ruling, if upheld, would be a "dangerous precedent requiring boroughs across Pennsylvania to violate existing laws such as the civil service provision of the Borough Code and the Veterans Preference Act."

He added: "PSAB has a significant interest in the adjudication of this matter which shall have a substantial and direct statewide impact upon the legislative functions, duties and responsibilities of borough officials."

He noted there are 2,448 fire companies in the state and a large majority are volunteer-based.

Coburn, in his legal brief, said those fire departments save municipalities and taxpayers about $6 billion annually. He suggested if firefighters are considered employees, other volunteer municipal appointees, such as planning and recreation commission members, could be considered employees.

In an interview, Coburn said it's not uncommon for his organization to file legal arguments in cases such as these. He said the townships organization has heard from some of its members about the case.

"This could have an effect on other townships and boroughs, depending on what their structure or relationship is between their [municipality] and volunteer fire departments," he said. "You've got the unionization issue and the potential that they would be considered employees under the Affordable Care Act."

Emmaus Borough Manager Shane Pepe said last week the borough has continued to pay firefighters under the same stipend structure in place before the group voted to unionize. He said borough officials, required to negotiate with the union while the appeal is pending, held their first negotiating meeting with firefighters earlier this month.

Source: Firehouse.com

No comments:

Post a Comment