In the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA’06), Congress
amended the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act (ERISA) to make comprehensive changes to the pension funding rules
for both multiemployer and single-employer defined benefit (DB) plans. Under
PPA’06, the multiemployer funding rules were amended to encourage a long-term
approach to funding and to give trustees tools to reach financial stability.
The most significant change, however, was the creation of a new statutory
framework that requires trustees of all plans to identify projected funding
problems earlier, monitor them on an ongoing basis, and, for plans heading
toward or already in financial distress, use a new remedial approach.1
Because this was a new framework, Congress included as a
safeguard a “sunset” provision (with a “continuation clause” to keep the rules
in place for plans currently operating under them) that would require it to
revisit these rules to determine if they were working as anticipated.2 Except for plans that are in endangered status
(in the “yellow zone”) or critical status (in the “red zone”) and “operating
under” a funding improvement plan (FIP) or rehabilitation plan (RP) in the plan
year beginning in 2014 (hereafter referred to as “the 2014 plan year”), those
provisions are scheduled to expire (sunset) on the last day of the 2014 plan
year (December 31, 2014 for calendar-year plans) unless Congress acts
to extend or eliminate the deadline.
This Compliance Alert describes the continuation
clause that extends the expiring provisions for plans that are in the yellow or
red zone and operating under an FIP or RP in the 2014 plan year and
some of the questions
that will need to be answered if the sunset occurs.
A text box at the end of this Compliance Alert
describes common
misconceptions about the PPA’06 sunset. A supplement to this publication describes the PPA’06
provisions that are scheduled to sunset.
The sunset contains a continuation clause to keep the
expiring provisions in place for plans that are in the yellow or red zone and
are operating under an FIP or RP in the 2014 plan year. These plans are
required to continue to operate under the FIP or RP, as applicable, during any
period after the sunset date that the FIP or RP is “in effect,” and all
provisions of the IRC or ERISA relating to the operation of the FIP or RP will
remain in effect during that period.3
Impact of the Sunset
If the sunset occurs, the impact on plans that were in
the green zone in their 2014 plan year is relatively clear: these plans will
continue to operate under the funding rules for financially healthy plans put
into place by PPA’06.4They will not revert to the pre-PPA’06 funding
rules, nor will the PPA’06 single-employer plan rules apply to them. However,
these plans will no longer be required to annually certify their status, to
provide notice of that status (if it would have been yellow or red in some
future year), or take any other actions related to their status that was
required under one of the expired provisions. Any of these plans that are in
deteriorating financial health will no longer have access to the remedial
actions offered under the zone rules. Instead, they will be able to address
their financial condition only through traditional pre-PPA’06 methods such as
future benefit reductions, contribution increases, and possible mergers with
stronger plans until they recover or become insolvent. In addition, employers
contributing to these plans will have no special rules to relieve them of their
minimum funding obligations or any related excise tax on deficiencies.
The impact of the sunset on plans that are subject to the
continuation clause is less clear. PPA’06 §221(c) states only that these plans
must continue to operate under their FIP or RP during the period the FIP or RP
is in effect, and that all provisions of the IRC or ERISA relating to the
operation of the FIP or RP remain in effect during that period. While this
directive might seem straightforward enough, there are many questions about how
plans covered by the continuation clause rule will continue to operate, as
discussed in the next section.5
The issues identified in the following questions need to
be clarified:
What
does it mean for a plan to be “operating under” an FIP or RP for its 2014 plan
year? The
answer to this question determines whether a yellow- or red-zone plan is
covered by the continuation clause. While the answer is likely to be clear for
a plan that has been in the yellow or red zone for a number of years, questions
have been raised about plans becoming yellow or red in 2013 and 2014.
For example, will a plan that becomes yellow or red and adopts its FIP or RP
toward the end of the 2014 plan year be considered to have been operating under
the FIP or RP for that year? Also, if no collective bargaining agreements were
adopted incorporating an FIP or RP schedule before the 2015 year, will a plan
be considered to have been operating under the FIP or RP in 2014?
For
a plan that is covered by the continuation clause, which of the provisions that
would otherwise sunset remain in effect after 2014? For example, one of
the PPA’06 provisions scheduled to sunset is the minimum funding contribution
exemption for employers contributing to a red-zone plan complying with the
terms of the RP. That exception protects those employers from being subject to
an excise on funding deficiencies. Whether that protection would continue after
the sunset is unclear. Failure to continue that exemption would be a serious
issue for those plans. Also at stake is whether the other PPA’06 employer
excise taxes will be available to enforce the remedial measures adopted in the
FIP or RP, for example, the excise tax on employers that fail to make
contributions required under a FIP or RP. If all measures that would otherwise
sunset remain available, there arguably should be no change in how a plan
operates immediately after the sunset deadline, at least for the period of time
that the FIP or RP remains in effect, except those changes called for under the
FIP or RP.
For
purposes of the continuation clause, what is the period for which an FIP or RP
remains in effect after the 2014 plan year? The answer to this question determines how long the
plan will be able to continue using the remedial rules. The continuation
clause is in effect for a plan for “any period after December 31, 2014 such
[FIP] or [RP] is in effect.”
Other Important
Questions Related to the Possible PPA’06 Sunset:
These questions
also need to be answered:
- Can a plan move to a different zone after 2014?
- Can a plan exit the yellow or red zone? When and how?
- Are updates to the FIP or RP required or optional?
- Can or must goals/annual standards be changed?
- Can or must schedules be updated?
- What happens if a plan fails to meet “scheduled progress” under a zone?
- What happens if a plan fails to meet FIP benchmarks at end of the funding improvement period?
- What happens if a plan fails to meet RP benchmarks for three consecutive years?
- What happens if an employer fails to contribute in accordance with RP/FIP schedules?
Implications
The implementation of any statutory provision raises many
interpretive and operational issues, and the PPA’06 sunset is no exception. It
had been hoped that Congress would act in advance of 2014 so that there would
be no need to address these issues. Absent regulatory or legislative guidance,
Segal consultants can work with fund counsel to help trustees determine how to
approach these questions.
Common
Misconceptions about the PPA’06 Sunset
There are a number
of misconceptions about the PPA’06 sunset:
- The sunset makes all of PPA’06 expire. It does not. The only provisions that sunset are the provisions related to the multiemployer zone rules. (Those provisions are listed in a supplement to this publication.)
- The sunset makes all multiemployer plans “green.” It does not. Red- and yellow-zone plans operating under an FIP or RP in their 2014 plan year will continue to do so.
- The sunset restores the pre-PPA’06 multiemployer funding rules. It does not. The general funding rules of IRC §431 and ERISA §304, as enacted under PPA’06, remain in effect. For example, the 15-year amortization rule remains in effect.
- The sunset affects single-employer plans. It does not. Only multiemployer plans are affected.
As with all
issues involving the interpretation or application of laws and regulations,
trustees should rely on fund counsel for authoritative advice related to the
interpretation and application of PPA’06, including the sunset provision. Segal
Consulting can be retained to work with trustees and fund counsel on these
issues.
1
Generally, under the PPA’06 changes, trustees must review
projections of a plan’s financial status at least annually in order to identify
potential issues before they otherwise materialize. If the projections reveal
an emerging funding problem, the plan is classified as being in “endangered
status” (referred to as the “yellow zone”) or in “critical status” (the “red
zone”). A plan that is in neither the yellow nor the red zone is in the “green
zone.” In the first year that a plan is certified to be in the yellow or red
zone, trustees must adopt a course of action to improve the funded status of
the plan: a funding improvement plan (FIP) for a yellow-zone plan or a
rehabilitation plan (RP) for a red-zone plan. These plans must be reviewed
annually thereafter and updated as needed. For more information on PPA’06, see
Segal’s August 2006 Bulletin, “Pension Protection Act of 2006’s Key Multiemployer Plan
Provisions” and December 2008 Bulletin, “Pension Relief Bill’s Provisions Affecting Multiemployer Plans.”
(Return to the Compliance Alert.)
2
See PPA’06 §221(c):
(c)
SUNSET
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in this subsection, notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the provisions of, and the amendments made by, [PPA] sections 201(b), 202, and 212 shall not apply to plan years beginning after December 31, 2014.
(2) FUNDING IMPROVEMENT AND REHABILITATION PLANS.—If a plan is operating under a funding improvement or rehabilitation plan under section 305 of such Act [ERISA] or 432 of such Code [IRC] for its last year beginning before January 1, 2015, such plan shall continue to operate under such funding improvement or rehabilitation plan during any period after December 31, 2014, such funding improvement or rehabilitation plan is in effect and all provisions of such Act or Code relating to the operation of such funding improvement or rehabilitation plan shall continue in effect during such period.
(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in this subsection, notwithstanding any other provision of this Act, the provisions of, and the amendments made by, [PPA] sections 201(b), 202, and 212 shall not apply to plan years beginning after December 31, 2014.
(2) FUNDING IMPROVEMENT AND REHABILITATION PLANS.—If a plan is operating under a funding improvement or rehabilitation plan under section 305 of such Act [ERISA] or 432 of such Code [IRC] for its last year beginning before January 1, 2015, such plan shall continue to operate under such funding improvement or rehabilitation plan during any period after December 31, 2014, such funding improvement or rehabilitation plan is in effect and all provisions of such Act or Code relating to the operation of such funding improvement or rehabilitation plan shall continue in effect during such period.
Although not included in §221(c), the automatic approval of
five-year amortization extensions in IRC §431(d) and ERISA §304(d)(1) also
expires for applications submitted after December 31, 2014. (Return to the Compliance Alert.)
3
PPA’06 legislative history indicates that amortization
schedules in effect at the time of the sunset also continue. See page 72 of the
Joint Committee on Taxation’s Technical Explanation of H.R. 4, the “Pension Protection Act of
2006” August 3, 2006 (JCX-38-06). (Return to the Compliance Alert.)
4
See IRC §431 and ERISA §304. (Return to the Compliance Alert.)
5
A number of these questions were raised in Multiemployer Pension Plans: Report to Congress Required by the
Pension Protection Act of 2006 (January 22, 2013) (Three-Agency
Report). For example, see pp 50-51. See also Segal’s February 2013 Bulletin,
“Recently Released PBGC Reports Focus on Multiemployer Plans.”
(Return to the Compliance Alert.)
No comments:
Post a Comment