Pennsylvania teacher Mary Trometter grew accustomed to
the near constant barrage of union-sponsored political ads leading up to the
mid-term election, but when they used her name in a letter to sway her husband,
they pushed too far, she said.
Trometter, 50, of Williams-port filed a charge with the
Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board on Tuesday, accusing the state's largest
teachers union and its national parent of making an illegal campaign
contribution.
The case could ultimately clarify a state law that limits
how union dues can be spent in politics.
Unions may legally spend dues “to communicate with
members and their immediate family” about a candidate their boards recommend,
Pennsylvania State Education Association spokesman Wythe Keever said.
Keever said this particular type of communication
wouldn't happen again.
It was the first time the union had attempted to
personalize such letters, and Trometter wasn't the only PSEA member who was
upset.
Keever said the union has apologized to about 30 members
who complained about the personalized mailers, which were sent to at least
20,000 households.
“We'd never done a mailing of this type before, and we
won't be doing it again,” he said.
The letter that arrived at Trometter's home addressed to
her husband outlined the union's case against Tom Corbett and concluded:
“Please join Mary in voting for Tom Wolf for Governor on November 4th.”
Trometter, a registered Republican who never intended to
vote for Wolf, found that offensive, she said.
“When I first read it, I was shocked,” said Trometter,
who teaches culinary arts at the Pennsylvania College of Technology. “They were
exploiting my name and membership for their own political causes.”
State law expressly prohibits using union members' dues
money to support a candidate, said David Osborne, general counsel for the
Fairness Center, which filed the charge on her behalf.
Their case cites Section 1701 of Pennsylvania's Public
Employee Relations Act, which states that, “no employee organization shall make
any contribution out of the funds of the employee organization either directly
or indirectly to any political party or organization or in support of any
political candidate for public office.”
State law has allowed, however, political communications
from union leadership to union households.
Keever noted that the United States Supreme Court's
decision in Citizens United lends a First Amendment protection to that
communication over and above state statute. Citizens United is generally
understood to have conferred First Amendment constitutional rights upon
corporations. It applies to unions as well, specifically in Pennsylvania under
the terms of a separate case, General Majority PAC v. Aichele, so long as the
union does not coordinate with the campaign.
“A lot of people have the perception that union dues
cannot be used for political candidates,” said Nathan Benefield, vice president
of policy analysis at the Harrisburg-based Commonwealth Foundation. “That's how
they present it, but you have to look at the fine print.”
In its July newsletter, PSEA reported that “dues are
allocable to lobbying and political expenditures,” including thousands in
commercials, mailers and media buys.
Campaign finance reports show the National Education
Association and American Federation of Teachers, the nation's two largest
teachers unions, spent a collective $60 million in the 2014 election cycle.
Most of their candidates, except Pennsylvania Gov.-elect Tom Wolf, lost.
PSEA is the state branch of the National Education
Association.
Between June and September, records show AFT Solidarity
and NEA Advocacy — Super PACs funded through AFT and NEA, respectively — gave a
combined $1.06 million to PA Families First, a state political action committee
that spent nearly $2 million in the same period to produce and air an “Oppose
Corbett” ad.
Bill Frye, 56, of Derry in Westmoreland County left the
union and his job at Mt. Pleasant School District, where he taught for nearly
30 years.
Lawrence County teacher John Cress, 41, said, “If someone
wants to support the causes the union does, that's fine. It's your decision.”
Cress left his local PSEA affiliate last year. “But if you know you don't agree
with their politics, you should have the option not to fund it.”
Source: Tribune
Live
No comments:
Post a Comment