Several funds operated by concrete labor unions allege in
two new lawsuits that construction companies have been creating “alter egos” to
avoid paying tens of millions of dollars in union benefits.
In one suit, several funds claim that Navillus Tile and
sibling owners Donald, Kevin and Helen O’Sullivan hid their interest in two
other companies in an effort to get out of labor agreements the firm had
previously signed. The O’Sullivans, the suit alleges, “fraudulently schemed” to
use Times Square Construction and Advanced Construction Solutions to avoid
paying more than $35 million that would have gone to pay for workers pensions,
training, education and vacations.
The suit was filed Oct. 17 by funds and members of the
Metal Lathers Local 46, Cement Workers, Cement Masons Local 780 and the
Carpenters. The unions, which say they all had bargaining agreements with Navillus
that mandated fund contributions, are members of the Concrete Industry
Coalition.
Most of the 48-page complaint is spent establishing that
Times Square and Advanced Construction are directly tied to Navillus and should
therefor be subject to the bargaining agreements. It notes all three companies
had sent letters to the city Department of Buildings using the exact same
language, that that the companies had used trucks that belonged to Navillus and
that all shared some of the same key employees.
Despite those connections, the companies performed work
projects covered by union contracts in New York, including on the City Point
project, on a Bronx project funded by the city’s Housing Preservation
Development agency and several others, the complaint says. It also alleged that
Advanced Construction “engaged in harassment and intimidation of its employees
to prevent them from having any contact with labor unions.”
The suit was filed by attorney Susan Jennik, who earlier
this year settled a similar case for the Metal Lathers Local 46 and the
Carpenters benefit funds for more than $6 million. That case involved River
Avenue Contracting Corp. and RNC Industries, which the suit alleged was an
alter ego.
Jennik filed another suit against those companies in late
October for funds belongings to Cement Masons Local 780. The complaint seeks
more than $2 million in damages.
Jennik said these cases are pretty cut and dry.
“It doesn’t mean in every situation where there’s a
non-union entity there is an alter ego,” she said. “Basically, what you have to
show is that they—the two companies—are being run by the same people in control
and they’re being treated and managed and operated as one entity. So you look
at, are employees working for both companies? Are they sharing equipment? Are
they transferring money?”
Willis Jay Goldsmith, an attorney for Navillus and the
related companies, did not respond to a message seeking comment on Tuesday. A
message left at the office of River Avenue contracting was also not returned.
Source: Capital
New York
No comments:
Post a Comment