Thursday, October 9, 2014

Industrial real estate sales in Chester County on the rise



Sales of industrial buildings in Chester County have reached levels that haven’t been seen since before the recession.

Demand for these structures, which can range from warehouse, flex and distribution, is being driven by a combination of low interest rates enabling companies to buy buildings cheaper than renting them and economic deals on the properties. Prices for industrial and flex buildings stood at $100 to $120 a square foot before 2008 but are now trading for $65 to $70 a square foot, said Bill Wilson of Lieberman Earley & Co., a commercial real estate brokerage and development firm.


Those factors have meant one thing: “It makes more sense for these owners to buy for their companies,” Wilson said.

Firms that buy get added tax benefits from owning and the potential that their properties may increase in value in the future.

It doesn't work for everyone and seldom does a dynamic such as this emerge when it makes more sense for a tenant to buy rather than rent a property. The numbers do show that sales have increased. During the first half of this year, $23 million in sales of flex-warehouse properties took place, Wilson said. That’s up from $7 million last year and $1.4 million in 2012.

A majority of those transactions were made by firms buying for themselves. Some properties bought by companies for their own use include:

424 Creamery Way, a 27,000-square-foot building in Exton, Pa., bought by Liberty Tools.
264 Welsh Pool Road, a 10,600-square-foot building in Exton, bought by Taylor Products.
757 Springdale Blvd., a 24,300-square-foot building in Exton, acquired by Brian’s House.
200 Philips Road, a 7,150-square-foot building in Exton bought by Bala Builders.

The trend to buying has meant some of the better properties have been scooped up leaving some of the less desirable ones to linger on the market, said Phil Earley, who is also with Lieberman Earley. Some of these buildings have even been challenging to lease for a range of reasons including not having the right office-to-warehouse ratio or the configuration of the building just doesn’t work for a firm’s operations.

Next up? Build to suits.

“We’re just starting to see those come back,” Earley said.

No comments:

Post a Comment