Analysis of 15 States and D.C. Also Finds Changes Vary
Across States and Insurers
Results
Suggest Consumers Should Shop Carefully When Open Enrollment Begins November 15
MENLO PARK, Calif. – An early look at the cost of health
insurance in 16 major cities finds that average premiums for the benchmark
silver plan – the one upon which federal financial help under the Affordable
Care Act to consumers is based – will decrease slightly in 2015. The new study from the Kaiser Family Foundation
analyzes premiums in the largest cities in 15 states and the District of
Columbia where information from rate filings is available.
Premiums for the second-lowest cost silver plan for
individuals will fall by an average of 0.8 percent from current levels in these
cities when open enrollment begins on Nov. 15, according to the study. The
analysis finds that the premium for the second-lowest-cost silver plan is
decreasing in 7 of the 16 areas studied – but also that changes in average
premiums will vary considerably across areas. They range from a decline of 15.6
percent in Denver, Colorado (to $211 per month), to an increase of 8.7 percent
in Nashville, Tennessee (to $205 per month). In both cases premiums are for a
40-year-old nonsmoker, before taking into account any tax credit. It is
important to note that rate changes may be different in different rating areas
in these states.
“There is variation, but so far, premium increases in
year two of the Affordable Care Act are generally modest,” said Drew Altman,
Kaiser’s President and CEO. “Double digit premium increases in this market were
not uncommon in the past,” Altman added.
At least two insurers will offer coverage through the
marketplaces in the major city in each of the 15 states studied and D.C. Most
areas will have five or more insurers, and three will have 10 or more. The
study finds that insurer participation generally held stable or increased in
all of the cities, with the exception of Portland, Oregon, where the number of
participating insurers decreased from 10 to 8.
Modest changes in premiums would be a boon for the
federal budget, but for consumers the picture is more complex
The second-lowest-cost silver plan in each state is
closely watched because it is the benchmark that helps determine how much
assistance eligible individuals (those with incomes from 100 percent to 400
percent of the poverty level) can receive in the form of federal tax credits to
help them buy coverage.
If early trends hold and average premiums for the
benchmark silver plans decline across the country, the federal government could
end up paying out less than expected in tax credit subsidies overall for 2015.
Lower benchmark silver plan premiums would mean savings for taxpayers.
For Marketplace consumers, however, the implications are
more complicated. On the one hand, the availability of tax credits can cushion
eligible individuals from having to pay more even in areas where premiums will
rise. The analysis finds, for example, that in nearly all of the 16 areas
studied, a single 40-year-old with income of $30,000 a year would pay 0.8
percent less in premiums in 2015 than in 2014 to enroll in the
second-lowest-cost silver plan, after taking tax credits into account.
On the other hand, even people who receive federal
financial help may face large premium increases if they simply re-enroll in the
same plan in 2015, since in many cases the lower-cost plans in 2015 will no
longer be among the low-cost offerings next year. This is because people
receiving tax credits must pay the full difference in premium between the plan
they choose and the second-lowest-cost silver plan in their area. In 12 of the
16 cities, at least one of the insurers that had offered one of the two lowest-cost
silver plans in 2014 is no longer offering a low-cost silver plan in 2015.
“Consumers should go into the open enrollment
period prepared to shop for the best deal all over again,” said Kaiser Senior
Vice President Larry Levitt, co-executive director of the Foundation’s Program
for the Study of Health Reform and Private Insurance. “You could end up
paying more if your insurer is no longer offering one of the low-cost plans, so
you should look carefully at your options.”
For bronze-level plans, which cover about 60 percent of
enrollees’ health expenses on average, the analysis finds that the premium for
the lowest-cost bronze option across the marketplaces is increasing an average
of 3.3 percent in 2015. Here again changes vary across areas, from a decline of
15.7 percent in the premium (to $196 per month) for the lowest-cost bronze plan
available in Hartford, Conn., to a premium increase of 13.3 percent (to $165
per month) for such a plan in Baltimore. Bronze plans are the least expensive
option someone can choose to satisfy the ACA’s requirement to have coverage.
Areas studied, methodology
The analysis provides state-by-state estimates of
premiums and premium changes for the lower-cost bronze plan and the two
lowest-cost silver plans available through ACA marketplaces in Los Angeles,
Denver, Hartford, Conn., Washington, D.C., Portland, Maine, Baltimore, Detroit,
Las Vegas, Nev., New York City, Cleveland, Portland, Ore., Providence, R.I.,
Nashville, Burlington, Vt., Richmond, Va., and Seattle. The report shows
lower-cost plan premiums in 2015 and 2014, before and after federal tax
credits, for a 40-year-old single adult who is a nonsmoker and earns $30,000 a
year. It also compares 2015 and 2014 marketplace premiums for such plans, after
factoring in tax credits, for a 25-year-old individual, a family of four with
two 40-year-old adults and two kids, and a retired couple of 60-year-olds.
The analysis is based on 16 markets where states have
publicly released comprehensive data on rates or rate filings for all insurers.
The overall picture could change as more premium data becomes available. The
full report, Analysis of 2015 Premium Changes in the Affordable Care
Act’s Health Insurance Marketplaces, is available online.
Download the entire Analysis of 2015 Premium Changes in the Affordable Care Act’s Health Insurance Marketplaces
in PDF.
Source: Kaiser
Family Foundation
No comments:
Post a Comment