Contract talks between union employees and FairPoint
Communications have been on hold since the company declared an impasse two
weeks ago.
Union officials say a strike is possible, but they’re
concerned about the risks and the effectiveness of striking. For the moment,
they’re exploring other options.
It could take weeks for the National Labor Relations
Board to consider unfair labor practice claims by the union and decide whether
FairPoint was justified in declaring an impasse in negotiations.
In doing so FairPoint announced it would unilaterally
reduce benefits for unionized employees.
Waning membership has meant less political power for
unions. Court decisions and regulatory changes have increased the risk involved
in striking.
Although union members gave leadership the authority to
call a strike once their contract expired nearly six weeks ago, no strike seems
imminent.
Waning membership has meant less political power for
unions and court decisions and regulatory changes have increased the risk
involved in striking.
Mike Spillane of the International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers, which represents about 1.800 FairPoint employees in
Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine says it’s a different era than when past
strikes were called.
He cites the bakers union strike against Hostess as an
example. Hostess closed down and
liquidated its assets. A buyout firm reopened the company but 15,000 union
employee were out of a job.
“Now Hostess is back on the shelves, but it’s certainly
not the union that had labor issues. They’re all gone,” says Spillane.
Spillane says a strike is still an option but since the
impasse the union has been concentration on bringing pressure to bear on
FairPoint in different ways.
This week the Associated Press reported that the
comptroller of New York wrote a letter
to the CEO of a private equity firm that is FairPoint’s largest
shareholder asking him to ensure that workers are treated fairly by the
company. Spillane says the letter came about through union efforts.
“We got the right people who know somebody who knows
somebody else that brought to our team the ability to get that letter written,”
he says.
Spillane says the union has approached members of
Vermont’s congressional delegation asking them to contact FairPoint on their
behalf.
Sen. Bernie Sanders issued a statement saying,
"FairPoint must negotiate a fair contract with its employees and I look forward
to working with the CWA and IBEW to make sure that happens."
A spokesman for Rep. Peter Welch said the Congressman has
spoken with a FairPoint representative and, "urged the company to come
back to the table and reach an agreement".
It’s also contacted AARP in hopes the organization will
urge FairPoint to restore health coverage for future retirees, one of the
benefits the company has eliminated.
The union is also considering a statehouse rally to
mobilize public support.
Spillane says the union is weighing the possibility of a
one day walk-out, or a series of day long work stoppages.
“The downside is, is it worth the effort,” he says.
“Would the company lock you out on a day?”
FairPoint could lockout union employees or hire non-union
replacement workers in the event of a strike.
The union can appeal these actions to the National Labor Relations
Board, but the risks and the time involved in that process appear to be
something the union hopes to avoid.
FairPoint has consistently maintained that the terms of
the old union contract, including 100 percent health coverage, medical benefits
for retirees and a defined benefit pension plan, are inconsistent with union
benefits elsewhere and are excessively costly.
FairPoint also wants more flexibility to hire non-union
contractors.
Source: VPR
No comments:
Post a Comment