One of the mysteries of the housing market’s uneven rebound
centers on what home builders say is a shortage of qualified workers.
Anecdotal concerns about a shortage don’t quite add up for
many economists, who say if there was truly a shortage of skilled construction
workers, then the share of construction workers who say they’re seeking
employment and can’t find any would be lower. July’s report on the job market
shows that the unemployment rate for construction workers has fallen to 7.5%,
back to 2007 levels. Still, that level is higher than pre-recession norms, and
the ratio of construction workers to housing starts stands roughly 40% above
the pre-crisis level, suggesting considerable slack.
And if employment for construction workers was tight, then
wages would be rising faster; much of the recent pick-up in residential
construction wages has barely recouped the big drop in average paychecks during
the bust.
If labor shortages “were
truly having a first-order effect on retarding growth in the housing market,
one would naturally expect to see wages for construction workers and prices of
construction supplies rapidly accelerating,” said economists at J.P. Morgan
Chase & Co. in a June report. “Nothing like this is even remotely
occurring in the data.”
So are builders’ complaints
of a worker shortage not credible? Not necessarily. Anecdotal and survey data
suggest builders may face a shortage of specific laborers in certain markets,
even though concerns about a widespread labor shortage may be over the top.
A survey released by the National Association of
Home Builders last month sheds some light on the
disconnect.
The survey showed that the
specific tradesmen that are most in demand tend to be framers and
carpenters—trades whose skills are fairly specific to putting up new homes and
less transferable to other fields. Painters, roofers, electricians and other
workers who might have found employment doing remodeling or other improvement
work throughout the downturn have been easier to come by, according to the
builders’ survey.
The upshot may be that the
framers and carpenters—who are both harder to find right now and who may have
had fewer work opportunities during the downturn—may have “quit the sector
entirely,” says Paul Diggle of Capital Economics, in a recent
report.
Overall,
the builders’ survey found that 46% of respondents reported worker shortages
among nine different categories of tradesmen, up from 34% in 2013 and 21% in
2012. The NAHB stopped polling its members during the housing bust, but the 46%
figure is higher than in any of the surveys between 2002 and 2006, when
builders were putting up twice as many homes. The figure is lower than during
the 1996 to 2000 period, when the economy was growing much faster than it is
today and the unemployment rate reached 4%.
The upshot, says Celia Chen,
a housing economist at Moody’s Analytics, is that “aggregate numbers miss
nuances in the home building industry.” Labor data don’t distinguish between
individual markets and between skilled and unskilled workers. As a result,
“builders could struggle to find labor in some sub-markets despite a balanced
national market.”
For example, the NAHB says
its members are reporting bigger shortages among subcontractors, which account
for a large portion of home-building jobs and which tend to be self-employed
workers or sole proprietors that could go uncounted as employers or employees
by government statisticians.
Builders’ labor headaches
could be a reason that they’ve been aggressively pushing to raise prices, a
move that appeared to backfire after mortgage rates jumped last summer, robbing
home sellers of more pricing power. Nearly two thirds of builders surveyed by
the trade group said worker shortages had led them to pay higher wages, and
three in five said that shortages had made it harder to finish projects on
time. (This story offers a deeper dive on builders’ labor headaches and
potential effects on housing markets.)
The NAHB survey also showed
that builders reported that labor costs for their own employees had gone up
2.9% in June from six months earlier, compared to gains of 1.4% in March 2013
from six months earlier. Costs for subcontractors rose by 3.8% in June,
compared to 2.8% in March 2013.
See the entire article and multiple
data sets in chart form by going here…
Source: WSJ
No comments:
Post a Comment