Compliance-minded companies
always want to know, “What’s the risk of noncompliance?” Or, put another way,
“How much will it hurt if we don’t get it right?” For companies still wondering
whether spending a little now to implement a solid immigration compliance
program is a sound investment, some of the recent immigration-related penalties
provide compelling reasons to invest in training and compliance.
Remember—all employers
have immigration-related compliance obligations regardless of whether they
employ any foreign nationals. Some of the companies suffering significant
penalties identified below never even had any unauthorized workers in their
workforce but merely fell short on their obligation to verify employment
eligibility (the Form I-9 process) or discriminated against certain individuals
during the Form I-9 process.
Penalties imposed in any
given case are always fact-dependent, and of course, the employer’s response to
the investigation can significantly affect the outcome of any investigation.
With that in mind, taking a look at the recent penalties imposed provides a
good perspective of the risk.
Generally,
immigration-related violations risk the following potential penalties:
- Prison time (from up to six months for knowingly hiring an illegal worker to 10 years for harboring an illegal worker);
- Civil fines (up to $16,000 per worker);
- Asset forfeiture;
- Debarment;
- Loss of business license;
- Lost productivity (for example, after a Form I-9 inspection in 2009, American Apparel lost 40 percent of its workforce and suffered significant financial losses that it attributed to lost productivity, causing its stock to drop 41 percent after reporting losses in the second quarter of 2010);
- Attorneys’ fees;
- Negative publicity; and
- Often, other crimes such as tax fraud, Social Security fraud, money laundering, identity theft, bank fraud, and false statements are uncovered during what begins as an immigration-related investigation.
To put these penalties in
real terms, see the examples from recent investigations.
Source: HR
Hero
No comments:
Post a Comment