An investigation by city Inspector General Amy Kurland found
13 rec center workers to be in violation of a Home Rule Charter provision that
bars city employees from holding two governmental jobs.
Ten, including the nine who will be reinstated with back
pay, also worked for the School District of Philadelphia. Two others worked for
the US Postal Service, and another for the state Attorney General’s Office.
But Arbitrator Anthony Visco Jr. sided with arguments from
the union, which pointed out the city was well aware of their jobs with the
district when it hired them and even recruited some of them to the rec center
positions specifically because of their experience as educators.
Visco did not, however, reinstate four other employees
because of a technicality related to the timing of their terminations, according
to Sam Spear, the lawyer who argued the case for District Council 33 of the
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.
Spear said the overall issue was not whether the employees
were in violation of the Charter provision, but whether it was being properly
enforced.
“The employees every year told the city that, ‘We had those
other jobs and we got approval,’ and now the administration decides to turn
around and just change the rule,” Spear said.
City Solicitor Shelley Smith said the administration has not
yet reviewed the decision, which came down late today.
With the arbitrator’s decision, the episode is doubly
embarrassing for the administration because it led to a minor controversy over
whether some of Nutter’s top aides were also in violation of the Charter
provision.
J. Matthew Wolfe, the Republican nominee in last month’s
City Council election, raised the issue by pointing out that some of the
highest-paid city employees carry multiple titles.
For instance, Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey, whose
salary is $261,375, is also a deputy mayor and can earn more than the Charter
designates for the commissioner job because of his extra position.
Spear said he did not raise the issue before the arbitrator
but considers it symptomatic of the problem.
“They should enforce the rules but do it on a consistent
basis,” he said, “and not every 10 or 20 years, or just against the poor people
rather than the favored.”
Source: Philly.com
No comments:
Post a Comment