Ships
used in global transportation of goods keep getting bigger and faster — and
Philadelphia’s port is hoping to grow with them.
To
capitalize on changes in the shipping industry, the Southport Marine Terminal
in South Philadelphia is planned at a cost of $300 million. It will consist of
shipping piers, storage areas, rail yards and easy access to nearby I-95 and
I-76. While parts of the 275-acre facility are already receiving shipments of
ethanol and other products, most of it won’t come online for another two to
three years.
It could
more than triple the number of jobs at Philadelphia Regional Port Authority
facilities from 5,000 to as many as 17,000. It is the first major expansion of
the port in more than 50 years.
“If all
goes well, 2017 will be the magic year,” said Charles G. Kopp, chairman of the
Philadelphia Regional Port Authority and a lawyer in Cozen O’Connor’s business-law
department. “The development of Southport will have a tremendous impact on the
port’s future, especially the employment and economic development it will
generate. … We believe Southport will be one of the major, if not the most
major, engine to stimulate the economy and produce jobs for the Philadelphia
region in the next 5 to 10 years.”
Philadelphia’s
port network already handles 80 million tons of cargo each year (see chart).
Other investments are already being made to upgrade the port.
At the
Tioga Marine Terminal in Port Richmond, a mix of public and private money is
being used to build a 300,000-square-foot receiving center for the imports of
eucalyptus pulpwood from Brazil, which is shipped in by a company called
Fibria. To allow for larger train cars to get the pulpwood from the port to
paper towel factories owned by Kimberly-Clark and other manufacturers, the
Corbett administration earmarked money to improve rail beds leaving from the
Tioga terminal.
Yet much
of the future growth is pinned on the Southport facility, which is situated
south of the Walt Whitman Bridge and other port facilities and north of the
Navy Yard.
Sean E.
Mahoney, PRPA director of marketing, said the idea for the Southport facility
was triggered in 2007, when the Port of New York started to hit capacity.
“We were
always trying to get shipping lines to expand into Philadelphia,” said Mahoney.
“With the Port of New York congestion and cost, in 2007 the shipping lines
started calling us, which was a refreshing change.”
With the
expansion of the Panama Canal — the short-cut between the Pacific and Atlantic
oceans — ports are quickly making adjustments.
“Most of
the major ports on the East Coast are working like crazy to get deeper water in
advance of the Panama Canal project completion,” said Mark Miller, director of
corporate communications for Crowley, a major shipping line based in
Jacksonville, Fla.
John
Martin, a strategic consultant and principal at Lancaster-based Martin
Associates, works with ports around the world. He said New York, Baltimore and
Norfolk, Va., all have deeper channels — at 50 feet, versus 45 in Philadelphia
— and at least a half-dozen other ports are in the process of deepening
shipping channels.
“Ships
will continue to get bigger, but there are a lot of other factors that go into
whether a port is competitive — labor costs, railroad pricing, how efficiently
ships can be unloaded ... The terminals have to be extraordinarily productive,”
Martin said. “I don’t know whether one port is doing better than another. I
don’t think you can rank the ports.”
While
most of Southport is three years from completion, adjacent facilities at Piers
122 and 124 are already being leased as an intermediate stop for ethanol. The
ethanol comes by rail from the Midwest, is housed in holding tanks and then
moved by barge from the port to the refineries of Philadelphia Energy Solutions
(the joint venture between Sunoco Inc. and the Carlyle Group LP) in South
Philadelphia.
Southport
is under construction on 120 acres south of Packer Avenue and north of the Navy
Yard, a portion of a larger, 275-acre site that is ripe for port expansion. It
is estimated to cost $300 million, with some state funding but also a major
investment from the port’s private operator, Delaware River Stevedores Inc.,
which already operates the Tioga Marine Terminal.
The site
has been cleared of former Navy housing, at a cost of $25 million.
Proponents
say Southport is long overdue. “The Southport expansion project once completed
will be a big plus for the region,” said Manuel N. Stamatakis, a past chairman
of the Delaware River Port Authority.
At one
time there were 13 major shipbuilding facilities on the Delaware River in and
around Philadelphia. Now the Aker Shipyard in the Navy Yard is the only major
shipbuilding facility. Stamatakis, who is also chairman of VisitPhiladelphia,
said this is a chance to revitalize the shipping industry here.
“When the
Base Realignment and Closure Committee recommended the closure of the
Philadelphia Naval Shipyard it was the last of 13 major shipyards to close. I
believe when the Navy Yard finally closed in 1995 there was a loss of over
7,000 jobs,” Stamatakis said. “It was shortly thereafter when work began to
replace those jobs by re-utilizing the entire Navy Yard. Twenty years later the
region has done pretty well.”
Stamatakis
was one of the early proponents of deepening the channel.
“One of
the big opportunities associated with the deepening of the channel was that it
could generate more private-sector port business for the region. Southport,
with its [projection of] 8,000 to 12,000 jobs is the perfect example of that.
The fact that the private sector will invest between $250 million and $300
million dollars to build Southport is a real testament to the hard work that
has taken place in the last 20 years to make up for the closure of the
Philadelphia Naval Shipyard.”
While the
Navy Yard is being developed as an office park, its fortunes are to some extent
intertwined with Southport.
“According
to the PRPA’s plans for fully electrified container operation, [Southport] will
require significant electric capacity, and, that there will likely be a very
interesting opportunity to provide clean energy and natural gas based
generation alternatives as part of the overall plan,” said Will Agate, an
official at Philadelphia Industrial Development Corp. and senior vice president
of management and development at the Navy Yard. “Finally, the west end of the
PRPA footprint could likely serve as a large distribution center, which will
require coordination between PIDC and the PRPA in order to maximize this
potential.”
Source: Philadelphia
Business Journal
No comments:
Post a Comment