May 2, 2014
On November 11, 2012, Gunderson Rail Services, which does
business as Greenbrier Rail Services (Greenbrier), a nation-wide railway car
repair and maintenance provider, laid off 28 of 90 employees working at its
Tucson, Arizona facility in the wake of its employees’ union organizing
campaign, wherein a majority of Greenbrier’s employees signed union
authorization cards affirming they wanted the Sheet Metal Workers’
International Association, Local 359 (Union) to represent them in collective
bargaining.
After the NLRB’s Phoenix Regional Office, Region 28, found
merit to the Union’s allegation that the layoff was unlawful, a NLRB
administrative hearing was scheduled and began on September 17, 2013. Just
prior to the start of the hearing, Greenbrier’s officials announced plans to
close the Tucson facility and lay off the remaining employees. The Region then
determined that the impending closure and further layoffs were unfair labor
practices aimed at further disrupting union organizing efforts.
Thereafter, the Region, with Board authorization, sought
injunctive relief in the U.S. District Court, requiring Greenbrier to reopen
its Tucson facility, restore its operations, reinstate the laid off employees
and bargain with the Union. It sought this temporary injunctive relief because
Greenbrier’s actions squelched all union support at its facility and an
immediate remedy was needed to counter Greenbrier’s unlawful actions while
issuance of a final Board was pending.
On March 14, 2014, Senior District Court Judge Frank R.
Zapata, agreeing with the NLRB, issued a temporary injunction (Injunction
Order), ordering Greenbrier to reopen and restore operations at its Tucson
facility, to offer immediate reinstatement to the Tucson employees, and to
bargain with the Union in good faith. The Injunction Order was subsequently
clarified to require Greenbrier to continue its past practice of sending its
own rail cars and equipment to Tucson for repair or service, to inform its
largest customer that it would charge the same rates it had in effect in 2013,
and to further inform other past customers that its Tucson facility had
reopened and solicit them to use Greenbrier’s services.
Greenbrier appealed and filed an emergency motion to stay
the Injunction Order to the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. On April 23,
2014, the Ninth Circuit denied the stay request and ordered that Greenbrier
comply with the District Court’s Injunction Order, as clarified, by no later
than May 5, 2014. The appeal remains pending.
#
No comments:
Post a Comment