Monday, May 12, 2014

How your firm can gain an edge on university projects - Top administrators from five major universities describe how they are optimizing value on capital expenditures, financing, and design trends—and how their AEC partners can better serve them and other academic clients.

The Edith O’Donnell Arts and Technology Building, known as ATEC, at the University of Texas at Dallas. The 155,000-sf project was brought in at a construction cost of $47,677,622 and total cost of $60,500,000. In the last few years, the high-tech university, which was founded as a research facility for Texas Instruments, has completed a new visitor center, parking garage,



The last decade has been a period of robust construction activity for American colleges and universities, but many institutions of higher learning are now tapping lightly on the cap-ex brakes.

To take the pulse of campus activity, Building Design+Construction spoke with top capital development executives at five prominent universities: Cornell University, Gonzaga University, the University of California at Santa Barbara, the University of Texas at Dallas, and the University of Wisconsin–Madison. With one exception, their campus building booms are past their peak, yet all five still have significant projects under construction and in design.

Post-recession budget cuts at many institutions of higher learning––largely due to poor returns on their endowments and falloffs in alumni donations––are having a negative effect on capital spending, forcing colleges and universities to work even harder for traditional funding: bonds, donations from foundations and other non-alumni sources, and public funding.

A less direct but perhaps even greater threat to campus construction: mounting public pressure to hold down tuition and student fees. With the average debt of graduates now topping $30,000, many parents and students are questioning the wisdom of piling up such a financial burden to earn a degree, especially if they perceive their precious tuition dollars going toward retiring the debt of fancy new recreation centers or other “nonessential” buildings.

Read the entire article at Building Design & Construction Network

No comments:

Post a Comment