GMCS Editorial: the
article below is an excellent analysis from Ballard Spahr's Labor and
Employment Group on the outcome of the recent UAW / VW organizing campaign as
well as some anticipated future strategy for the UAW. The pressure applied by Senator Corker and others,
with implied threats that could arguably chill the employee’s efforts to organize,
have been the topic of discussions amongst many labor professionals throughout
this campaign. The NLRB does not look favorably
upon actions by employers that effectively chill an employee’s intentions. While the employer was a neutral in this campaign
and advocating for the UAW, it remains to be seen how these outside forces will
be viewed by the NLRB should the election outcome results be challenged by the UAW. GMCS expects to see challenges to the election
results in response to the implied threats made by elected officials.
The United Auto Workers suffered a devastating defeat at the
polls at Volkswagen AG’s Chattanooga, Tennessee, plant on Valentine's Day,
losing an National Labor Relations Board-conducted election by a vote of 712 to
626. The defeat comes despite unusual
management neutrality, which included unprecedented access to the VW plant and
workforce, joint labor-management communications, and silence from line
supervision.
Is this loss the death knell for the UAW and organized
labor? Hardly. Here are three developments to look for in the election’s
aftermath.
Bolstered by decisions from the Obama NLRB that made it
easier for unions to organize small groups of employees, or micro units, and
the Board’s recent announcement of new rules and regulations to streamline its
election process (so-called "ambush elections"), unions will lower
their sights and take aim at smaller employers and groups of workers.
UAW
pressure on foreign auto makers in the Southeast will not abate. The union has
spent millions to create an organizing infrastructure. Although it is obligated
to not organize at VW for one year, expect the UAW to turn its attention to
vendors and suppliers of the major auto makers, where it recently has had some
success, organizing Mercedes Benz suppliers like ZF Industries, Faurecia
Interior Systems, and Inteva. These smaller victories support UAW President
King’s statement that “the perception is wrong that you cannot organize in the
South.”
Expect
legal challenges to the unprecedented outside influences brought to bear at the
VW election. The Koch brothers and Grover Norquist funded publicity campaigns
against the UAW. Federal and state legislators were especially aggressive. U.S.
Senator Bob Corker (R-TN) assured VW workers that if the UAW was rejected, the
reward would be the addition of a new midsize SUV product line in Chattanooga.
State Senator Bo Watson (R-Chattanooga) announced that there would be
opposition in the statehouse to any tax incentives for VW expansion if workers
chose to be represented by the UAW.
Under current NLRB rules, it is unlikely that VW can be held
responsible for these statements, which clearly would be unfair labor practices
if made by an employer. However, given the Obama NLRB’s clear agenda to make it
easier for workers to organize, expect enhanced legal scrutiny of these outside
influences, with possible changes in the law applicable to their conduct.
Although the UAW, and all organized labor, has suffered a
bitter defeat in the most favorable of circumstances, expect unions to redouble
their organizing efforts in smaller, lower profile, less public venues.
Attorneys in Ballard Spahr’s Labor and Employment Group have
uncommon experience in addressing issues involving labor-management relations.
Our attorneys can assist clients with advance planning for unionization efforts
and responding to legal issues involving unions and the NLRB.
For more information, please contact Steven W. Suflas at
856.761.3466 or suflas@ballardspahr.com or the member of the Group with whom
you work.
This publication was written by members of Ballard Spahr's
Labor and Employment Group
No comments:
Post a Comment