GMCS Editorial: With
private sector unionism at or below 7%, organizing campaigns are on the rise.
Private sector employers were once confident that most
organizing campaigns could be managed as their activities and actions would be
closely monitored within the organization.
Over the last year, we have witnessed a rise in the use of social media
to effectively execute a highly effective organizing campaign against an
unknowing employer and outside of the organization’s brick and mortar presence.
In the article below, we see yet another example of an
effective social media campaign and how it was used to broadcast a message to many at a relativity low cost and
to develop a strong base of support, both inside and outside of the
organization.
This campaign was even more successful and reached an even greater audience as it was widely
publicized through main stream media outlets on many evening news
channels. While the stated Black Friday
work stoppage participants were significant according to labor sources, the media coverage was even more significant and
cast a wide net of mainstream media coverage.
Furthermore, the NLRB is pursuing unfair labor practice charges against
this non-union employer for alleged violations of the Act as of January 15,
2014.
As is the case with many employers engaged in an organizing
campaign, most do not realize that a campaign is taking place until it is well
underway and established. This new
strategy and method enables the organizing effort to take place without
organizers ever stepping foot on the organization’s property and or directly
engaging the workforce. This is one
strategy that we believe that we shall see more of going forward here in the
Philadelphia region. GMCS clients are
advised to regularly monitor and review their online presence and foot
print. More importantly, as you are
reading the article, take and moment and consider just how effective a strong
Employee Relations program would have been if implemented by management well in
advance of the campaign.
Walmart workers and organizers prove ‘clicktivism’ can
evolve into offline activism.
|
Making Change at Walmart organizers translated social media
support for the Black Friday strikes into real-life actions at Walmart stores
around the country. (Photo: Making Change at Walmart )
The basic tools of labor organizing haven't changed in
hundreds of years. There's no substitute for face-to-face conversations about
working conditions and what can be done to change them. Organizers still make home
visits, and workers still talk to one another in the break room or the parking
lot.
But in the new wave of low-wage worker organizing that has
swept the country in the past two years, some labor groups have begun to use
the Internet to facilitate the kinds of personal conversations that lead to
workplace action. As unions, community organizations, workers centers and even
“netroots” groups like MoveOn.org pour resources into organizing a massive,
diffuse fast-food and retail workforce that had often been written off as
unorganizable, the web has provided a cheap, effective tool to reach low-wage
workers in ways that are both personal and lasting. In particular, the United
Food and Commercial Workers-backed groups OUR Walmart and Making Change at Walmart
have enthusiastically experimented with web tools in their recent efforts to
make a difference at the nation’s biggest retailer.
As Jamie Way, an online organizer with Making Change at
Walmart, puts it, “We're never going to match [Walmart] in terms of resources,
we're never going to have an organizer or a community supporter on the ground
in every one of their [more than] 4,000 Walmarts.” To combat this, the campaign
has created online spaces for organizers to reach workers and for communities
to support local efforts. And those online connections can, in turn, drive
offline actions.
Of the estimated 1,500 Walmart protests that occurred across the country on Black Friday
last year, many were planned online, organized either directly by OUR Walmart
or using its templates and tools. Much of that turnout came from the kind of
efforts that have become commonplace in recent years—creating Facebook event
pages, for example, or posting links to event websites on Twitter.
But some of the campaign's efforts are decidedly more
innovative.
During the lead-up to this past year's Black Friday actions,
OUR Walmart unveiled AssociateVoices, a website where Walmart workers could
post their stories about their experiences on the job and request a protest at
their particular store, even if they themselves were not ready to go on strike.
“The idea was to illustrate this silent majority that exists at these stores,”
Way says.
“Walmart's constant refrain has been that it's a very small
number of disgruntled associates and community- and labor-backed groups that
are [speaking out]. AssociateVoices was intentionally designed to show that
these complaints are not just made up, these are very real things that happen
at Walmart,” says Raymond Suelzer, the web developer for Making Change at
Walmart and the architect of AssociateVoices.
“For those of us who last worked retail 20-plus years ago
(or more—or never!), reading the discussion boards is an eye-opener,” writes
Kati Sipp, a longtime union organizer and creator of the future-of-labor blog
HackTheUnion.org, in an email to In These Times.
Worker complaints on AssociateVoices do often get very
specific. One worker in Billings, Montana suggested that management should
“Quit listening to a computer to tell you how to run a store,” and “Fix the
razor sharp door handles around the store”; in Virginia, a worker identifying
herself as Tori writes that when she was pregnant, her manager refused to grant
schedule changes that would allow her to care for her children. But there are
also common threads that run throughout—the standard refrains of not enough
hours and insufficient pay, and everywhere calls for respect.
AssociateVoices is just OUR Walmart’s latest effort to
connect Walmart workers with each other online, however. According to Suelzer,
the group has been using social media to that end for the last three years or
so. Facebook's targeted advertising allows OUR Walmart to run ads directed at
the thousands of users who list Walmart as their employer. Those ads send
workers to OUR Walmart's page, where they are then able to connect with other
Walmart associates. And then, Suelzer says, these conversations around
workplace issues go offline.
“We've seen that when workers talk to one another it doesn't
just stay on the Facebook page,” Suelzer says. “Those relationships become
real, in that they're talking offsite. Most of our online work is
worker-to-worker. We have a couple of organizers who oversee and provide
feedback to workers, but so much of it really is a substantial number of online
leaders who are really taking initiative and reaching out to other workers.”
That’s exactly how Lucas Handy discovered OUR Walmart. An
overnight customer service manager at the Walmart in Fort Dodge, Iowa, he was
complaining about his job on Facebook when he saw an ad for the organization
pop up on his sidebar. Intrigued, he clicked and found himself talking with
Angela Wilson, an organizer from Florida, who invited him to an OUR Walmart
summit for workers in her state. Walmart had warned the workers to avoid OUR
Walmart—that they'd risk being fired if they got involved with the
organization—but Handy took the risk and went to the meeting.
When he returned, he remained a silent member, participating
online but not taking action in his store, for a while, until another manager's
homophobic slur became the last straw. “That was the icing on the cake, that
made me step up and speak out,” he says. He went through the steps that his
store had laid out to report the abusive behavior, but instead of that manager
facing consequences, he says, Handy himself was demoted to a position as a
pharmacy technician. “I lost my pay, I lost hours, I lost healthcare, I lost
everything,” he says. “The day I was supposed to start [at the] pharmacy was
the day I went on strike, on a two-week strike.”.
Shortly after he went on strike and then took a trip to
Netroots Nation to speak about his part in the Walmart campaign, Handy was
fired—the reason Walmart gave, he says, was that he’d misled management about
the time he took off to attend the conference. But he still volunteers as the
LGBT liaison for OUR Walmart, maintaining a closed Facebook group for LGBT
Walmart workers to discuss their issues in a safe space and reaching out to
other Walmart workers in other Facebook groups to which he belongs. “People are
more comfortable online than they are person-to-person because of the
technology we have nowadays, and so I find it more comfortable talking to
somebody down in Texas or Florida that's having issues,” he says. “Management
is probably not around them and other associates are probably not around them
either, so the confidentiality between me and somebody else is there.”
Facebook isn't the only place to reach workers, Suelzer
notes—because the social media giant is becoming less popular with people
younger than 25, the campaign has had to do some “experimenting” on sites like
Twitter and Instagram, which don't necessarily lend themselves to personal
conversation in the same way Facebook has. And Handy sees lots of potential in
getting on other sites—even MySpace, which, he notes, is making a bit of a
comeback.
Workers who have seen OUR Walmart organizing, particularly
around Black Friday, on Facebook and Twitter, have been motivated to join the
strikes, some without even talking to organizers first. In 2012, OUR Walmart
put out a “strike kit” before Black Friday, and this past fall, building on
those efforts, made an effort to have more organizers available to workers who
might want to take action.
Part of the reason online organizing has been slow to take
off in the broader labor movement is because of the “digital divide”—the
division between those who have convenient access to the Internet and those who
don't. But Jamie Way points out that this gap isn't as big as is often thought
by people who don't work in her field. “The real difference tends to be how
[different people] access [the Web] and where they access it. A ton of the OUR
Walmart activity online is from mobile devices.” A Pew Research Center [PDF]
study from 2012 backs her up, noting that 88 percent of adults have a cell
phone and 62 percent of adults in households that make $30,000 a year or less
report using the Internet.
“It's a mistake to think workers aren't there,” says Way.
“You just have to think a little bit more about where certain conversations are
had and what devices are used to have them.”
Often organizing done via text message has been one-sided—a
campaign can send a text blast but the ability of recipients to respond has
been limited. Way seeks as many ways as possible to allow workers to provide
feedback. To that end, the AssociateVoices site allows workers to text in
responses to the site as well.
Getting activists out of armchairs
On the other side of the campaign, the community
mobilization and solidarity effort by non-Walmart workers organized by Making
Change at Walmart, the online strategy is different. Twitter, a medium that
lends itself more to broadcasting than to personal connections, has been more
useful in this respect. It works especially well when a relevant topic “trends”
on the site, or to drive supporters to offline actions.
“Initially a lot of the stuff we were doing online was
fairly traditional,” says Way of these community mobilization efforts.
Indeed, online petitions and mobilizing supporters to share
things on social media have become standards of “netroots” work, and labor has
jumped on the bandwagon. But this type of action has run into criticism for
encouraging “clicktivism” and discouraging real-world participation—the
ultimate goal of labor organizing.
So when Black Friday 2012 rolled around, the campaign sought
new ways to take the online energy out into the streets.
Here, the ubiquity of Walmart worked against the company.
People who wanted to be supportive by protesting the retailer often had a
target right in their neighborhood. Just
as OUR Walmart had a strike kit for workers, Making Change partnered with
online organizing group Corporate Action Network to put out a “protest in a
box,” with basic guidelines and signs people could print out. They tried to
draw on movements like Occupy and the fight against the Keystone XL pipeline,
allowing participants to design their own action while maintaining common
elements.
“There's always, in my mind, this tension between how much
support you provide and how much space for co-creativity you allow so that
you're not stifling groups,” Way says. “I wanted to leave things very organic
initially—I didn't want to give very much guidance to the people who would come
and volunteer to do these actions.”
But after the first Black Friday, the organization found
that many people actually wanted more support and direction. “For some people
it wasn't the exciting experience it could've been if they had a little more
preparation,” Way says.
One problem was that when protesters hit a store where OUR
Walmart did not have active members, the response from the workers was not
always positive. Though Making Change at Walmart tries to make it clear that
they are a solidarity campaign, not an attack on Walmart, she points out that
there is definitely potential for people to hold actions that are alienating to
workers rather than motivating. Actions in the store, for example, where people
load shopping carts and leave them around or try to pay with small change, wind
up making the workers' day harder rather than leaving them feeling supported. (Though, she notes, she's been impressed
overall by the restraint and concern for workers that community activists have
shown.)
This year, to prevent problems like that, the campaign made
a team of organizers available online and via a toll-free phone number to
provide trainings for people interested in holding an action. These kinds of
“online to offline” tactics help bridge the gap without requiring organizers in
every town.
On this Black Friday, the organizers also used the Twitter
tool Thunderclap, which coordinates a large number of people to tweet the same
thing at the same time, to help drive traffic to BlackFridayProtests.org site—a
site created by the campaign where, in turn, users would be directed to a
protest nearby.“Walmart organized their own Thunderclap, [to promote
themselves] ours had like 3 million reach and theirs had like 300,000 so we
were pretty proud of that,” Suelzer notes.
Walmart takes notice
As the OUR Walmart/Making Change at Walmart campaign has
heated up online, Way notes, Walmart has taken its countermeasures online as
well. In addition to trying to legally shut down OUR Walmart websites by
claiming copyright infringement, the company launched a site,
OurWalmartFactCheck.com, to refute the organization's claims.
She also points out that the company has gotten “more
aggressive” on Twitter—a recent argument between the company's WalmartNewsroom
Twitter account and celebrity Ashton Kutcher illustrates the way Walmart has
stepped in to be more proactive about its image.
“They're smart, they're adapting. They see that online
organizing is important for how people are able to challenge them, and so
they're responding to that, trying to do their own version of grassroots
organizing.” However, she says, “I don't think it's been super effective for
them yet,” Way says. “It's a sign that the workers are really being effective
and that they have the company's attention, no matter how much the company
tries to deny it and act like this is some insignificant thing.”
It's important to Suelzer and the organization not just to
dispel Walmart's claims, though, but to be more effective at creating lasting
change. To achieve that, he says, organizers must have two-way conversations
with workers, ultimately letting workers shape the campaign. Though Way jokes
that both Making Change at Walmart and Our Walmart have run into plenty of
failure, the flexibility of the Internet allows them to quickly learn from
their mistakes and try something new.
“Five or six years ago, the ability to reach that many
workers wouldn't have been possible,” Suelzer says. “I think that combined with
the shift in thinking around inequality and economic justice, the social media
and the technology has definitely put us in a unique moment that is allowing us
to do things that many people would not have thought would be possible.”
Source: InTheseTimes
No comments:
Post a Comment