IT'S NOT UNUSUAL for a casino developer to negotiate a
benefits agreement with its neighbors once the casino's license is granted - in
2008, two years after they were awarded the first-ever casino license in
Philadelphia, owners of Fishtown's SugarHouse Casino signed one.
But Bart Blatstein's Tower Entertainment - which wants to
open Provence Casino at Broad and Callowhill streets - has been trying to get
an agreement with its neighbors signed, sealed and delivered weeks before the
license process is complete.
Casino opponents call the move an attempt to show the
Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board that the community, including a new Mormon
Church, does not oppose the casino, and perhaps to stifle potential foes.
Tower and four other applicants seeking the city's second
casino license will appear before the gaming board over several days, beginning
Jan. 28, in suitability hearings.
Gaming board grants petition to intervene in casino license
to schools, synagogue and SugarHouse
That's when applicants will make their cases for the
license, with witnesses and documents subject to cross-examination by the
gaming board.
Tower's draft neighborhood-development agreement, obtained
by the Daily News, promises such basic things as clearing trash and
construction debris and paying up to $450,000 a year to a
neighborhood-revitalization fund.
It also pledged to pay the North Broad Community Coalition
$90,000 to cover legal fees for Kevin Greenberg, the lawyer hired by the
coalition to look out for the neighborhood's interests.
The casino ownership's contributions to the
neighborhood-development fund have a caveat, however: They are contingent upon
Tower being awarded an unappealed casino license by the state.
The agreement would pay $300,000 a year for the first five
years starting 30 days after gambling begins. After five years, the casino's
contribution would bump up to $450,000 a year.
The proposed Provence project would stretch from Broad and
Callowhill west to 17th Street, and would have an immediate impact on the
Callowhill, Logan Square and Spring Garden neighborhoods.
In exchange for Tower's donations, the agreement requires
that the community take a "non-opposition" stance to the casino.
One critic, Philip Browndeis, who owns a condo a few blocks
away from the project, said, "My main concern is that in this agreement,
Bart Blatstein will [indirectly] pay Kevin Greenberg [who is supposed to be
representing the neighborhood residents] $90,000 when his same law firm is
representing the Isle of Capri, the company that will operate the [Provence]
casino."
"It is clear that Blatstein bought the silence of the
neighborhood for $90,000," Browndeis said.
Greenberg, the coalition's lawyer, declined to comment,
saying the agreement isn't final.
In the agreement, Tower agrees to pay the coalition's legal
fees seven days after it is signed, whether or not the Provence is awarded the
license.
The other contributions, though, won't be paid unless Tower
wins the license.
Tower Entertainment chose the Isle of Capri after Greenberg
had already started working with the North Broad Community Coalition to address
neighbors' concerns about safety and traffic.
Last March, Greenberg told the Daily News that the law firm
had established a "firewall" so that the competing interests of the
community would not be affected by another member of the firm representing the
casino operator.
Three member organizations of the coalition have already
spoken out against the casino. That happened at a hearing in Harrisburg last
week. The three have filed petitions to intervene in the gaming board's
decision.
The organizations - Rodeph Shalom Synagogue, the
Mathematics, Civics and Sciences Charter School and Friends Select School - are
all within 1,500 feet of the proposed casino.
"While North Broad Community Coalition, as a coalition,
may choose to sign the agreement, we, Rodeph Shalom, continue to believe that
this casino should not be in a residential urban neighborhood surrounded by
schools and religious institutions," said Dena R. Herrin, president of
Rodeph Shalom.
"The impact on traffic would be absolutely so terrible
and ultimately serve as a deterrent to visiting the casino or anywhere else in
our neighborhood."
The community groups within the coalition are in the process
of deciding whether to buy into the proposed agreement. Sources said the
coalition leadership is to vote it up or down by Jan. 23, only five days before
the Jan. 28 suitability hearing.
Anti-casino critics say the community groups are being
pressured to sign the agreement too quickly.
"The casino is using the neighborhood for
public-relations purposes and to help it get its license," said Paul Boni,
a local board member of the national advocacy group Stop Predatory Gambling.
"All casino developers offer the same sort of bribe to
stem opposition," added Dan Hajdo, a board member of Casino-Free
Philadelphia. "Along with the politicians, they tell community groups,
'Don't be active. Don't participate in government. Don't try to oppose this.'
There's the sense that [the organizations should] just give up and take what
you can get."
Not so, says Blatstein spokesman Frank Keel.
"The imminent signing of a Community Benefit Agreement
with our surrounding neighborhoods has nothing to do with publicity and
everything to do with being a responsible developer and neighbor," he
said.
As for the critics, Keel said, "The reality is that
there are some individual entities whose members are morally opposed to
gambling and there's nothing we can do about it. We also wonder if some members
of the few opposing entities might somehow be aligned with another casino
applicant."
Source: Philly.com
No comments:
Post a Comment