The Zoning Board of Adjustment approved variances on
Wednesday for a project at Columbus Boulevard and Swanson Street—near
Catharine, in Queen Village—entailing 75 townhomes with 75 parking spaces.
The project had earlier been recommended by the Planning
Commission after the developer redesigned certain aspects in response to
comments from the Civic Design Review Committee.
A small group of near neighbors—including Phyllis Pertnoy, a
board member of the Queen Village Neighborhood Association—first asked for a
continuance and then, rebuffed by the board, protested the variances outright.
Meanwhile, a member of QVNA’s zoning committee testified in support of the
project.
The property in question had previously been the subject of
a number of proposals for high-rise residential development, which Queen
Village residents had opposed.
The property was rezoned for single-family residential, and
the developers were seeking variances to build multiple structures for
multi-family use on a single lot; if they had subdivided the lot, 77 townhomes
could have been built by right, according to attorney Hercules Grigos, who
represented the developer, JKR Partners.
No parking is required for properties—like the one in
question—zoned RSA-5, for residential, single-family attached structures, and
yet the developers are providing one parking space for each unit. Queen Village
neighbors felt that wasn’t enough. So the developer made a deal with the
Delaware River Waterfront Corporation to have the homeowners’ association pay
for 30 spaces in a nearby parking lot.
Scott Klein, one of the near neighbors concerned about
traffic and congestion, felt that still wasn’t enough. The property is at an
awkward crossroads near the off-ramp from Interstate 95; its internal parking
area will be inaccessible to cars traveling north on Columbus Boulevard. At one
point during the hearing, Klein said the issue was “an all or nothing thing.”
“They want nothing,” Hercules Grigos responded. “That’s
exactly right.”
The group of protestants seemed to make competing
complaints: there’s not enough parking in the project, they said, and there
will be too much traffic congestion from cars coming and going from the
development.
Ultimately, the zoning board ruled that the community had
had ample opportunities to share its concerns with the developers, and ruled
unanimously that the variances were justified.
Source: PlanPhilly.com
No comments:
Post a Comment