Watching a movie at an iPic
theater, an executive for the Boca Raton, Fla., company assures, is a
"stress-free" experience.
Reclining seats. Blankets and
pillows, too. A buzzer on your armrest to call the waitstaff.
Sliders or flatbread sandwiches
delivered to your seat.
And, after a show, dinner or drinks
in the lobby.
More coverage
8-screen complex for Boyd?
"We want the lobby to feel
like a five-star hotel rather than a theater," said Paul Safran, general
counsel for iPic-Gold Class Entertainment.
But the company's plan for one
Center City movie house is becoming anything but stress-free.
The issue is not what iPic wants to
build, but where. It has set its sights on the shuttered Boyd Theater, whose
fading front overlooks the 1900 block of Chestnut Street.
iPic wants to restore the Art Deco
movie palace's facade and re-create the marquee as well as the entranceway.
But the existing auditorium, which
once seated more than 2,000, would be demolished - replaced with a building
that could accommodate eight screens for 744 moviegoers.
Safran said it was the only way to
make the project economically viable.
The company, along with the
building's owner, Live Nation Worldwide Inc., has applied to the city's
Historical Commission for permission to tear down the Boyd. The first hearing
on the matter is set for Dec. 17.
The proposal has alarmed groups
that have fought to protect the theater from just such a fate.
The Preservation Alliance, a
nonprofit that advocates to save the region's architectural treasures, plans to
list the Boyd as the No. 1 site on its annual "endangered list," due
out next month.
"This is the last great movie
palace in Center City," said Ben Leech, director of advocacy for the
alliance. "We've lost everything but this one."
The Boyd opened on Christmas 1928
as a silent-film theater, complete with pipe organ, orchestra pit, and murals
painted on the proscenium. Leech said its massive interior was as
"spectacular" as 30th Street Station or City Hall.
In 2008, the alliance successfully
petitioned the Historical Commission to include the Boyd as a protected asset.
"We should be thinking of this
as a resource," Leech said, "and not an impediment to
development."
Safran said in an interview that
the company spent six months trying to figure out a way to convert the existing
theater into an iPic movie house. But, he said, iPic's people could not make
the numbers work and walked away from the property.
Then, he said, local developer Neal
Rodin approached iPic about the demolish-and-rebuild option. Rodin, who has an
agreement to buy the property, would become the theater's landlord.
IPic's petition to the Historical
Commission lays out some options and pricetags. The company says it would cost
$53 million to convert the Boyd into a venue that could handle touring Broadway
shows; $43 million for a multipurpose theater for all types of live shows; and
$41 million for its original use - a single-screen movie theater.
The Boyd ceased operating as a
movie house in 2002. In 2008, there was a plan to incorporate the theater into
a hotel project. But the local developer behind the idea, Hal Wheeler, died.
Howard Haas, a Center City resident
who founded Friends of the Boyd, questions why this site has to be used for the
iPic project.
He has seen a presentation on the
iPic concept that Safran has been showing over the last few weeks to city
officials, neighborhood groups, and local businesses.
"It's impressive," Haas
said. But, he added, "let them build it on vacant land, which we have
plenty of in Center City."
Haas and his group will oppose
iPic's petition before the Historical Commission.
The conversion project, however,
has drawn supporters. Dan Coyle, a member of Friends of the Boyd, who lives
across the street in the William Penn House, wants to see it happen.
He pointed out that the Boyd has
been dark for more than a decade, creating an eyesore on the block. "We
need something to happen across the street," Coyle said. "We're
trying to maintain the integrity of the street. It downgrades the area. It's a
shame."
When the Historical Commission
takes up the matter, Leech said, the burden of proof in favor of demolition
should be set "very, very high."
The application "is really
saying that it's economically impossible for a single-screen theater to
exist," Leech said. "But have they really tried other things enough
to justify demolition?"
Nationally speaking, iPic is on the
march. The company has nine theaters across the country, six in development and
15 - including Philadelphia - on the drawing boards.
Philadelphia, Safran said, is
"ideal" for an iPic Theater. It's a big city with a vibrant downtown
"that doesn't have a good movie theater," Safran said. "We
honestly believe we're a good fit for Center City residents."
Source: Philly.com
Officials debate regulating gifts
to city workers
THE ETHICS Board, inspector
general, chief integrity officer and watchdog Committee of Seventy usually
spend their time scrutinizing city politicians and officials.
But yesterday, they turned their
scrutiny on one another during an at-times heated debate over how to regulate
the kinds of gifts city employees can accept.
The current law prohibits gifts of
"substantial economic value," which is considered by some to be too
vague. At issue was an Ethics Board proposal to limit cash gifts to $50 and
noncash gifts to no more than $200 in value in situations that may affect
employees' decision making.
Two Nutter administration
officials, Inspector General Amy Kurland and Chief Integrity Officer Joan
Markman, urged the board to reject the proposal.
"This regulation creates more
problems than it solves," said Markman, describing hypothetical scenarios
in which officials could still solicit and accept gifts, like a nice watch.
"This is just plain nuts!"
Ellen Mattleman Kaplan, of the
good-government group Committee of Seventy, said she would rather see the board
ban cash gifts entirely and limit other gifts to those worth $50 or less.
"Only in very, very limited
circumstances should any city employee be permitted to accept gifts," she
said. "Nobody should send this message louder and clearer than this Board
of Ethics."
Kaplan's comments prompted board
member Brian McCormick to defend the work of the board's staff, saying he "took
offense" to the suggestion that they were "hiding behind" the
inadequacies of current law as an excuse for a bad regulation.
Kaplan said she didn't mean to
criticize the staff or the board.
Former Ethics Board chair Richard
Glazer attended the meeting and didn't plan to speak until he heard the other
speakers.
"I was compelled to speak,
because I did not think that the full context of what the staff did was being
considered," he said after the meeting.
Glazer agrees that there needs to
be a bright line for when gifts are acceptable. "The problem is that there
have been, over decades, folks that have raised the issue," he said,
"and it's just not right to have something where 'substantial economic
value' is constantly being asked about and requested without there being any
definition of it."
Board Executive Director Shane
Creamer said that under current rules, gifts exceeding $200 could be permitted.
"People are losing sight at
times that we're interpreting an existing law, and that law permits people to
accept a certain level of gifts," he said. "Our proposed regulation
would actually limit the types and amounts of gifts compared to past
interpretations of the existing law."
The board could vote on the measure
in its meeting next month or take additional time.
Source: Philly.com
No comments:
Post a Comment