Against the
backdrop of tony Rittenhouse Square, protesters with the Philadelphia Coalition
Advocating for Public Schools and like-minded organizations donned Halloween
costumes Tuesday afternoon for a festive rally against the city's 10-year
property tax abatement.
The abatement,
which became law about 15 years ago, applies to all newly-constructed or
improved properties in the city.
But, according to
a report released Tuesday by PCAPS, the program will deprive Philadelphia
schools of millions in property tax revenue in the coming year, with three
buildings in Rittenhouse Square alone accounting for $2.1 million of the loss.
"The paper we
are releasing today documents two facts," activist and retired teacher Ron
Whitehorne said. "One, the schools are losing significant revenue because
of these abatements. We project the loss at $50 million in the coming
year. "Secondly, the main beneficiaries of these tax breaks are
wealthy real estate developers and owners. Of the more than 16,000 tax-abated
properties, the top five properties alone account for $15 million in lost
revenue to the school district. These are luxury condos and housing
developments concentrated in Center City."
The
PCAPS report, titled "Short-Changing Philadelphia Students,"
found just 24 percent of property tax abatements go to single-family homes,
while the majority of abated properties are owned by large developers.
"While our
schools are suffering, our city's most wealthy building owners are not paying
their fair share," said Kia Hinton, an activist with Action United and
mother of three students in the city public school system.
The protesters
attempted to deliver a "Trick or Treat" message, leafleting
tax-abated luxury highrises 10 Rittenhouse, 1706 Rittenhouse and Parc
Rittenhouse, but Civil Affairs officers and private security denied them entry.
Still, they vowed
they'd be back, and that they'd keep the pressure on elected officials to
modify the tax abatement to be more targeted so it benefits blighted
neighborhoods, rather than already-thriving areas like Center City.
Kevin Gillen,
senior research consultant at the University of Pennsylvania's Fels Institute
of Government, said the protest was somewhat short-sighted.
"Unfortunately,
I fear the abatement has been framed as 'school kids versus new development'
when, in fact, the abatement helps fund schools by attracting new residents and
expanding the tax base in the long term," he said.
Gillen pointed out
developers pay wage and sales taxes for labor and building materials. New
residents, in turn, become a continuous source of city wage and sales tax
revenue.
"Basically, you
trade off a little money in foregoing property tax revenue for 10 years in
order to get more money from new economic development, new residents and new
jobs," he said.
Gillen further
contended the abatement "has been absolutely critical to our building
boom," pointing to a report he authored earlier this year.
"In 1990, we
had almost no new construction in Philadelphia county, but plenty in the
suburbs. When the abatement was passed and went into effect, new construction
in Philadelphia almost immediately tripled, while it declined in the
suburbs," he said.
Whitehorne called
the argument "extortion" and contended the city's cash-strapped
schools are more likely to discourage new residents from moving to Philadelphia
than a lowered or abolished abatement.
"I'd rather
invest in schools, invest in the quality of infrastructure and take our
chances," he said.
Allan Domb of the
Greater Philadelphia Association of Realtors called the protesters
"misdirected."
"We need to
bring people to the city who pay taxes and provide jobs, that's important — it
helps everybody," he said. "There's no downside here. No one's trying
to take money from the school district."
He said school
funding advocates should instead focus on the $1.6 billion in delinquent tax
revenue owed to the city.
"The
direction of this march should be at the 15 percent of people who don't pay
their taxes," he said. "The energy of the people here is
misdirected."
Source: Philly.com
No comments:
Post a Comment