UPDATE:
Developer Brooks Lenfest responds here. EARLIER: A coalition of
Center City Philadelphia hotel owners has written Mayor Michael Nutter and City
Council Chairman Darrell Clark to protest planned tax breaks for Chestlen
Development Group's proposed W and Element hotels at long-vacant 1441 Chestnut
St. They say the site is not blighted; market financing is available; the
tax breaks will probably be larger than any new taxes the hotels generate;
Philly can't afford more tax breaks when its public schools are underfunded;
and there are already more hotels in Philly than city business and tourism can
support. Chestlen principal Brooks Lenfest was unavailable for comment at his
Bala Cynwyd office when I called. The letter:
As members of
Concerned Hotel Owners of Philadelphia, we write to you to respectfully express
our deep concern over the City’s plans to create the Headquarter Hotel Tax
Increment Financing District for the construction of a 700-room hotel at 1441
Chestnut Street.
Our coalition
members appreciate the support the City and Council have always shown for the
hotels in Philadelphia. You have been tremendous advocates, working with us to
creatively address issues and attract visitors to the City and our hotels. We
recognize that these proposed efforts to subsidize the development of a W and
an Element Hotel are intended to build business at the Pennsylvania Convention Center
– a goal we all support. But this is the wrong time, and the wrong
project.
Philadelphia’s
downtown hotel market is not strong enough to absorb another 700 rooms on top
of what’s already planned without cannibalizing business from existing
properties. The next few years are projected to be generally flat for the
Center City hotel market due to moderate increases in supply, but only modest
increases in demand and continued pressures on average room rate.
Occupancy
currently sits below that of other major East Coast markets, and property
revenues are projected to grow far slower than most other major markets over
the next three years.
If the W
development project was a true headquarters hotel – a 4-star conventional
property adjacent to the Convention Center – it could help sales efforts and
this hotel community would be more supportive. However, this development is too
far from the Convention Center to have the intended effect.
Furthermore, the
real key to attracting more convention demand is overcoming the Convention
Center’s well-publicized cost issues. We commend the effort of the Commonwealth
and the City to address these obstacles, but it is likely to be several years
before the full impact of these changes are felt and the situation improves in a
meaningful way.
In fact, we submit
that, after adjusting for reductions at other hotel properties, the proposed
project will not generate nearly the amount of tax increment or jobs that the
developers claim, and the City may very well end up giving away more money in
subsidies than it receives in additional taxes. We can look at the City of
Baltimore as a cautionary tale.
The City funded
the 757-room Hilton Baltimore Convention Center Hotel, which has vastly
underperformed projections, lost money and become a financial drain on the
City.
As Chestlen
Development seeks $33 million in TIF grants from the City and Redevelopment
Assistant Capital Program monies from the Commonwealth, it has inaccurately
represented the property as “blighted.”
As we all know,
the site is prime property in Philadelphia’s downtown core – adjacent to The
Ritz Carlton and across from City Hall. In truth, blight is not the issue here;
public subsidies are needed because there is insufficient demand to support a
hotel development of this scale. Unlike a few years ago, banks and a variety of
lenders are now lending on new hotel construction projects – where the market
supports them. And if a hotel development at that location was economically
viable, a developer could build it without a 27 percent subsidy.
Economics aside,
we find it troubling that as Philadelphia’s public schools struggle to find
funding, such substantial capital would be invested in a speculative hotel
development project.
There is a natural
alignment of interest between downtown hotel owners and the City. If this
project could produce the incremental demand that is projected, we would all
benefit and we would all be supportive. If the project fails to generate
substantial increased demand, as we believe it will, it will hurt the City and
us. We ask that you reevaluate any consideration to granting public monies to a
project that is likely to imperil our downtown hotels and negatively impact the
City’s finances.
Sincerely,
CONCERNED HOTEL
OWNERS OF PHILADELPHIA
HEI Hotels &
Resorts, owner of Le Meridien
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., owner of The Four Season; Marriott Downtown
KHP Fund II, L.P., owner of Kimpton Hotel Monaco; Kimpton Hotel Palomar
LaSalle Hotel Properties, owner of the Westin; Embassy Suites
Loews Hotels & Resorts, owner of The Loews Philadelphia Hotel
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust, owner of The Sofitel
Philadelphia Hospitality Partners, L.P., owner of The Ritz Carlton
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., owner of The Four Season; Marriott Downtown
KHP Fund II, L.P., owner of Kimpton Hotel Monaco; Kimpton Hotel Palomar
LaSalle Hotel Properties, owner of the Westin; Embassy Suites
Loews Hotels & Resorts, owner of The Loews Philadelphia Hotel
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust, owner of The Sofitel
Philadelphia Hospitality Partners, L.P., owner of The Ritz Carlton
** This is a
partial list of coalition members; other hotel owners have expressed their
commitment to and support for this effort and will be added.
Cc: Philadelphia
Deputy Mayor Alan Greenberger
John Grady, President, PIDC
Members of Philadelphia City Council
John Grady, President, PIDC
Members of Philadelphia City Council
Source: Philly.com
No comments:
Post a Comment